I know that some people are trying to reclaim the word, but I fear that continued usage of the word won't really help things. The word seems to have too much background as an insult specifically against women, as well as objectifying them.

Hopefully.

You shouldn't be proud of sexism.

It wasn't exactly the picture of equal rights and standing, mind you...

I see no reason why men "need" to be doing that as opposed to women. I'm pretty sure women are capable of hunting animals. I would not be surprised if the hunter-gatherers were more egalitarian towards biological gender than some civilizations were/are.

Your culture is terrible.

This may sound callous, but I am comforted by the thought that people like him won't be around forever.

It wasn't to begin with?

I don't see anything disallowing people who donate to this atheist woman from also donating to people of theistic faith or religion. It's not just one or the other.

I don't remember anyone mentioning deism in context of this.

I see this and many other charity groups as both intending to help people and further their cause (and I don't believe pursuing better perception of atheists in society is a bad one by any means). It's rarely either or.

There is no needed dichotomy here. You can be generous AND have activist goals in mind. Atheists are a minority and often face prejudice. While it's ideal to help everyone, that is often not practical. We have groups that focus on helping certain groups of people (like women) for a reason.

What's this juice part supposed to be anyway?

Of the two, I definitely prefer the donation drive to the religious right's conspiracy theories.

That's certainly a worthy cause to donate for.

It's also important to consider that the word, definition, and meaning of "intelligence" and the like were created within patriarchal societies...

They look great.

I kind of figure that men think that women think that men are slobs/etc or something.

Okay, so the sexism is that it's considered okay to depict women beating up men like this but not men beating up women. I don't necessarily agree that the advertisement itself is sexist or at least intended to be, but I do like that it's being criticized to highlight the differences between how violence against men or…

I'm not really sure what to think about this one. Can someone point out the exact problems here?