So....Kentucky isn’t suppressing the vote. Seriously, there are going to be more votes cast in the primary than there have ever been, they’ve just largely shifted to vote by mail.
So....Kentucky isn’t suppressing the vote. Seriously, there are going to be more votes cast in the primary than there have ever been, they’ve just largely shifted to vote by mail.
It’s California, if we’re going to be really honest the Death Penalty is effectively abolished in the state while still existing in law-- the only that’s shifting that is a Republican Governor.
Goop?! It has to be some performatively woke but still clueless celeb who also doesn't talk to African-Americans on anything approaching a regular basis
Shocker. Typical MAGAbel, at this point any Biden quote or story on Jezebel should source checked like it was from OAN or Fox.
Well he’s been channeling Nixon in ‘68, I guess it’s only natural that he throws in a bit of Reagan in ‘80*
Hell, I'd even throw in caveats like "poor people own horses...as work animals" Reade wasn't herding cattle or riding the land.
Was this Grassley? From my own experiences (a few decades later and more interest group/campaign consulting side) he’s always had the reputation of being a cheap prick- not thrifty (see sleep in office and/or bring food back from district types— which can come off as pretentious or endearing depending on the person…
Right bro.. Like how any accounting of major communist leaders and fascists leaders boils down to “both sides were authoritarians who committed mass murder” so fascism and communism are basically a wash
Because, Jezebel wants Trump to win to "prove Bernie should have been the nominee" or "teach the normies a lesson" or some similar bullshit-- they did the same "we're just looking for the truth of course we hate Trump" shit in 2016
Basically minus the Biden accusation, Reade is Jezebel's working definition of a Karen.
Not detract from your point but wouldn't the Senator equating 3k annually in 1955 to 22k in 1999 suggest they have some grasp of inflation?
One of the links in the article (as well my comment) literally points out how that’s more than a bit misleading: https://newrepublic.com/article/158104/rush-redefine-defund-police
To be really clear— there is absolutely no major American example of completely defunding the police— the oft-cited example of Camden (likely the model Minneapolis will follow)— was more of a reorganization of the Police force than a disbanding— with 250 Officers fired but significantly more officers hired for a net…
So.....who would that leave?
You have anything on the Nazi tat? I haven’t seen the driver having one noted elsewhere.
Yep. Read this shit— which should be a much, much bigger story— about a rookie cop who was fired for not shooting someone:
No— you want to get super pissed read this story— apparently what actually gets a cop fired fastest— is not shooting people.
Supposedly [according to the coroners report I think] one cop did call out the other 3-- the guy who was in his 3rd day on the job and apparently hadn’t been fully indoctrinated into the “back the blue” cult of the thin blue line yet.
A teacher fucks students and the union will cut them loose, that Police Unions don’t do the same is literally a microcosm of the central issue— there’s shitty people who work in every field— in Law Enforcement, participants seem almost uniquely reluctant to call out the bad actors.
100%. I do wish people would give the House credit for all the pro-active legislation they’ve passed but because it’s destined to die in the Senate virtually no one on the left (or center) actually notices anything the House has pushed through.