Very Trump of you—accuse others of your own failings.
Very Trump of you—accuse others of your own failings.
Very Trump of you--accuse others of your own failings.
“I’m going with “Cheap Shot” on this one. You don’t know this to be the case— it’s MUCH more likely that some policy guys pointed out all the Russian Naval activity up there, and suggested that if Putin “Pulls a Crimea” on us we have a problem.”
“It’s all approached from your POV.” Do you... do you actually believe you somehow are the only human exempt from this?
Riiight, this is certainly isn’t that you can’t distinguish biased reporting from things that disagree with your worldview.... no, it’s ... it’s fake news!
Me: Points out you ignored or willfully left out significant considerations
I mean, your original post ignores (willfully, I suspect) a staggering amount of necessary context and understanding to make the point that all of these articles are “spin-pieces”. What you ignored/did not address/or implicitly assumed
Wormsign!
I fail to see the struggle tbh. Why is it either or? She can be courageous for confronting her breakdowns and also (at least) thoughtless for leaving her parents in the dark and wasting taxpayers’ money.
Yep and I’ve done this. Forgot to mention so glad you did.
A unique address per site is a bit too much for me, even using a base + site abbrev. But as you say, it’s pretty much the ideal.
The email client is definitely a good approach. I don’t use one (prefer straight-up gmail), hence the forwarding.
That’s a good approach.
I have a personal email address, an email address that I use for all of my financial accounts, an email address I use with shopping sites, and an email address I use for social media and posting comments.
.
Your’s is even better, tbh
I believe the correct jargon used by the kids these days is, “yeet”
Trademark law you mean?
Translation: “I meant it as a dig, but since you’re mad I was joking!”
It’s a legit question, but I also don’t think it’s all that inscrutable. The answer is: Ernie Grunfeld.