You don’t become prosperous by handing out creflo dollars, do you?

We all understand that a corporation declining a sale and/or not donating their product to an art effort is not censorship right?

Racism bad, fat-shaming good. Got it, thanks!

This is what confuses me about the way the general populace views situations like this.

Oi. That takes an already complicated rule and makes it arguably more complex. Not sure what that improves.

There was an early IBM-PC football game I used to play... “NFL”. Players were literally X’s and O’s and the color palette was the old three color palette.

Ouch, that’s a clear example of the fencing response. He may be “fine” but that is one of the few overt indicators of concussion.

Great idea!

I honestly don’t know and partly why I said, “I’m not so naive...” but it would be ideal if you could buy multiple mobile portions, and it would be ideal if you could leverage one game across multiple mobiles.

Well, one thought I’ve had is that with three children, it is a little frustrating that I have a Wii U and three DS’s, and games that force us to purchase multiple copies in multiple form.

I’d say this thread should make it clear to you that perhaps you might be ignorant to a little haughtiness yourself. But that would be another point so obvious as to be meaningless.

I never said you did. Your statement took a class of people and implied that they somehow acted more (what other definition of ‘special’ would there be?) entitled than others.

Huh, I thought maybe when you said it the second time, it would sound insightful. But no, it still sounds ignorant. Who would have thought?

“All kinds of people can be a special kind of entitled.” FTFY Feeling entitled is something endemic to human nature in societies that are first-world. Sorry, it isn’t just new parents.

Can you say... astroturf?

Can you say... astroturf?

Here’s the problem the more we use someone’s bad behavior to rationalize or justify someone else’s retaliatory behavior the more perverse and unclear the ramifications get.

I see the reason in that response, but I can’t seem to get past my perception that any justification for a pursuit of multiple partners is anything other than a rationalization of ultimately selfish behavior.

And apparently a human being who can’t brook any challenge to his ideas or have a mature discussion.

Except we’re not talking about the video game itself, we’re talking about a video of specific playthrough of the game, which Nintendo did not record, nor play. The specific link you cite is related to the copyright of the game itself.