Nah your premise is slightly flawed, mate. You forget that all older women were in their 20s once, and had a chance to observe the behaviour of the men who were decades older and only wanted to date younger women when said men wanted them. They were, almost universally, not high quality material (and no one is so…

Nothing is ever set in my city, but I'm close enough to Vancouver, and yeah, it does enhance the story when they get it right.

Wot.

I lost about 20 lbs when I first went on the pill, myself. Clearly, it must cause weight loss.

No, I do: facial lines are directly observable and quantifiable. His are both longer, and deeper. Facial lines increase in depth and length with age; ergo, he looks older than Winslet in that respect. This is an objective statement, not my subjective opinion.

But the lines on his face are an objective quality, not a subjective one. And he has more of them, and they are objectively deeper than Winslet's. They don't look "rugged rather than old" - they look old. Younger men don't have them, or have less of them. Ergo, they age him. "Rugged" is a code word men use for, well,…

Yeah, there's no evidence whatsoever that that actually happened. There is however clear evidence of him referring to her as subhuman and wishing her death. Are you trolling or stupid?

I would honestly prefer a younger male actor as Bond. It would be a hell of a lot more believable, and more attractive to me as a young woman. But it's not my fantasies they're pandering to, with that character. It's men's.

But DiCaprio has - objectively, not subjectively - deeper lines on his face. How then can you say that Winslet "looks older"? Both actors are vocal about not going under the knife/using botox? I can describe in objective terms why they both look about the same age - or if anything DiCaprio looks slightly older, which…

It's obviously subjective perception because to me Kate Winslet looks MUCH older than Dicaprio

Eh, if you want this to change, you've gotta hit 'em in the only place they care about - the wallet. I've started to age check the casting of films and if there's a 25-year-old star with a 35-year-old mother, I won't pay for it. If the 50-something leading man has a 20-something love interest, I won't pay for it.…

Really? I've never found that men look younger than their ages, at least not at any greater rate than women do. I've met plenty of 50-something men who THINK they could pass for 37, but they don't actually.

No no, not that part. (SPOILERS) The part where Tom Hanks' character is shot by the same German he spares earlier on, which was heavy-handed to the point of knuckle-dragging. (/SPOILERS)

A mediocre small group adventure story with a terrible ending, at that.

Oh god yes, this. Twenty five minutes of one of the best war films of all time, that somehow got switched with an hour of the A-Team goes to Normandy and one of the most facepalm inducing endings of all time.

I was the same way - awed by the people who could "speak" so many different languages while it took me over a decade to get to where I'd even begin to call myself fluent. Then I talked to them again, in those languages, and found out that by "speak" they mean "garble out a childish, broken sentence" or "order…

Agreed, but make it 15-50. Teens with unexpected pregnancies often need access to those services the most direly.

Yeah that story sounds totally legit and not at all made up to support you "point", bro. The people who provided for you are your parents in the eyes of the law, and referring to a sperm donor as your "real father" and not the man who cared for you and raised you and supported you makes you sound like a selfish,…

"Real" fathers.

Nope, which is what makes this ruling completely pointless.