that 2006 civic si would cost 32,606 without adding in the destination charge in today money and pollute a shitload more and be far more likely to kill you in a crash. there is a reason everything costs more today.
that 2006 civic si would cost 32,606 without adding in the destination charge in today money and pollute a shitload more and be far more likely to kill you in a crash. there is a reason everything costs more today.
Great now let’s bully them into selling an Si hatch.
This. I like cars. I have an inoperable fun car right now because the motor’s junk and I keep going back and forth on what I’m going to throw into it. I also have an operable fun car, two dailies and a yard work truck. None of my neighbors care because they’re all kept looking nice and aren’t eyesores.
The problem with this stuff always seems to be that there’s always a few that just push the boundaries and ruin it for everyone. For instance, most neighbors wound’t get bent out of shape with a car that lives under a decent cover in the driveway. But leave an old rusty Camaro on jack stands for a 6 months – plus the…
Zora wanted a midengined vette. They finally made his dream come true.
And the CRX isn’t “below” the Civic. The 1989-1991 one was literally an EF hatchback with a slopier back-end. In some markets it’s sold as the Civic CRX.
I suggested that when they were soliciting input, but I guess my argument wasn’t strong enough. I also suggested the CRX. No love for the affordable, zippy 2-seaters!
I would think that the Honda CR-Z is sort of a successor of the CRX.
Sorry. You are correct. Ford lists the Mustang as a “car” on their website under the “SUVs and Cars” tab (even though cars in the plural is kind of misleading). Chevy keeps the Vette behind the “performance” tab.
Correct, Chevy makes the Corvette and the Malibu. Ford only makes the Mustang. lol, two is one more than one.
That’s one more car than Ford makes...
Isn’t the current Corvette essentially the new Fiero? I mean the styling screams Pontiac with all the different color plastics, etc. I like to think the C8 is GMs way of admitting they F’d up in 1988.
We should absolutely be fining loud babies. Lots of people enjoy the sound of a Lambo, no one is saying “oh cool a screaming baby”
Sleeping babies are usually pretty quiet, awake babies can be outrageously noisy.
I mainly hear this from non-enthusiasts, but Miatas. People still think they’re feminine and wimpy, and don’t realize it’s the most raced car in history, and for good reason. For $60k, you can get a turn-key, track ready MX-5 Cup WITH a sequential gearbox.
I’ve always thought deleting the back seats of a 4-door is pretty silly. I get it in a 2+2 where the back seats are not typically useful for carrying adults, but it seems to me if you are deleting the seats you are better off buying a car that was designed as a 2 seater in the first place.
So many to chose from, almost all of which have been mentioned by others already. For me, it’d be either the Acura NSX (somewhat “attainable”) or the McLaren F1 (way beyond my means to either acquire or to run—“engine-out service”? Not on my budget!).
It’s not just the greatest performance car of the 90's. It’s the GOAT:
The absolute correct answer is the F1, it is easily the greatest performance car of the 20th century to be fair.
McLaren F1.