I think most of the players are just looking for a reason to break this guy's face.
I think most of the players are just looking for a reason to break this guy's face.
I understand that.
What you said was completely irrelevant to my comment. Let me break it down for you since you are clearly retarded.
I have not and do not care to see them.
"Computers breakdown every other year"?
Not really worth frying your hardware, is it?
You believe that London is getting an NFL team?
Oh, I know. But punching an unwilling opponent is known as an "assault" on the ice.
Yeah, in this case it was obviously to fight.
This week the Canucks made the news cause Sestito fought a Kings player when he didn't want to. So next game, when a line full of fighters is out there to start the game (which is a pretty clear staatement) you can't put your skill guys on the ice because there is a strong possibility that Calgary's 4th liners were…
With the way Torts had Sestito assault Nolan I don't think it's too "out there" to believe that Calgary's 4th liners would have filled in one of their skill guys.
Past few games Canucks have been fighting a lot. Whole league has panned them and then the next team they play the coach challenged them to a fight.
Nah, Canucks last few games have been fight filled, whole league took notice and basically panned 'em for being goons.
True, I myself don't know much past what I hear about them on the highlights.
If you blame anyone, you blame the defense. They were supposed to be the strength of the team, no? 45 points against isn't supposed to happen to them.
Pssst... he was being sarcastic.
You are terrible at trolling.
You can probably argue the exact same for the Raiders right now. So much talk about them cleaning house but they were fielding an amateur squad of cast-offs because of cap penalties.
Is this a sponsored post? Why would anyone pay for that?
Did you read the article, dude? Take a gander at that last paragraph one more time, and try to understand what the guy is actually saying.