Shellman704
Greg Hellman
Shellman704

LFG is not the same as matchmaking. Matchmaking isn’t the same as LFG... Even if LFG is done in game with no external communication needed. The difference between the two is much greater than the difference between DLC and Expansion. Matchmaking is inherently random and automatic, while LFG is a more narrow search

Greg, your work is fantastic! This article was an amazing write and an even better read! Keep up the good work. It speaks for itself. You don’t need that Disney money through Whitlock, at this rate, you’ll be getting it one day from a source that better appreciates what you have to offer other than being young and

It’s one of those words that seems like just a combination of existing words to create a better fitting brand new word.... But it seems like infact teledildonics is a real word. Spell check even works on it... What is next? Teledouchebaging? Telemarijuanasmoknics? Telesonicfleshlightnic?

Get a patent lawyer. The one I knew worked for no upfront cost and was paid on the back end with some contract he had with my employer... Even if you have to pay upfront, it’ll be worth it. You’ll be seen as legitimate and won’t get treated like shit. If the lawyer is good he will take it straight to the patent

Kinkos!

No written opinion on it? These video only article are not.... Ideal.

I don’t think he said English is a perfect language... To be fair all Romantic languages are a “stupid mess”.

Coming in 2020.

Because racisim/sexisim. :(

By the end of the year Backwards Comparability will be available to all Xbox One owners and if you bought the digital version of the game, even if it is a retail game, it is there waiting to be downloaded in your ready to install list. But I’m sure you don’t want a ps4 for the same reason because up until now, both

Yeah... I don’t know where I got the 900k from... Maybe the 9 in 190k? It had been over a month since I had seen the stat so I was pretty much using arbitrary numbers to make my point... Memory isn’t what it use to be... Actually it has never been great.

This was a very entertaining read. Keep up the good writes Kirk!

I get it, but I am pretty sure it is account based, not card based. So one account only counts once towards the statistic I quoted with wrong numbers. It is closer to 200k available visits but only 150k actual visits. Even if I am wrong, with a sample size that large, you can assume that a lot of them are repeats but

The numbers I quoted aren’t right. 190k was the stat a month ago with like 150k going to light house. Your experience still doesn’t explain the discrepancy because weather it is account based or individual card base the number of visits to lighthouse are pretty substantially less than the number of visits available.

Still doesn’t make sense. Wouldn’t you want multiple rewards? Think the discrepancy is over people not knowing to go to lighthouse with their 9-0 card. They prob turned it into Brother Vance for the 8 wins reward.

Under 200,000 memory caused inflation.

I think none. I believe it is how many accounts went went to lighthouse. Not how many cards went 9-0. However, you could repeat on different consoles. So I don’t think many. If the # is off of 9-0 cards.... Then even less people got to the lighthouse. Which it doesn’t seem that way. And even then the discrepancy

They already have.

They already did a stat for it... Like 900,000 people had flawless cards but only 750,000 went to lighthouse... It was about a month ago, after the first or second week of Trials... The numbers could be wrong but still, more people had the chance to go to lighthouse than actually did. Noobz.

Not true. Teams can pull franchise tag designation any time before the player signs. Ask Seattle and Philadelphia... I wish I could remember the names of the players however.