Shavit
Shavit
Shavit

Judges won't excuse you if you have a bias towards the case—but lawyers might. You can get excused for bias during a process called voir dire, but that isn't as straightforward as saying "I'm biased" or "I think the defendant(s) looks guilty." If you think something that simple can get you out of jury duty in front of

You were right to do so. This is absolutely not a myth. When I worked as a law clerk out of law school, we issued contempt orders for people blowing off jury duty on a fairly regular basis.

Many of the things in this chart may not be true in your jurisdiction. e.g. it may be illegal to film police officers.

Just wanted to clarify. The picture shows what people mean when they refer to the quenelle as an "inverted nazi salute."

More nonsensical corporate speak.

Details do matter. In your corporate speak, dressing up of historical revisionism you seem to have left out a few in your defense of Dieudonne. Please, tell me which details of the Shoah have been impacted by an "ideological" and "dishonest discourse." Who made up these lies? For what purpose?

Luiz Suarez served a ten-game ban for biting Ivanovic during a game. Exactly what would get you taken off this list, if not biting an opposing player?

"All you have to do is take the keys, that's it."

That said, being lazy doesn't make me stupid. I love a challenging, complicated game. I'm sick of the handholding, tutorial-centric crap in games like Assassin's Creed. I hated the "consoleification" of Mass Effect as much as PC gamers did, and my favorite experience with XCOM was playing through it on Classic Iron

Fuck the criticism.

"If you need this app, I'd recommend practicing ..."

No, it doesn't.

at least Ronaldo pays his taxes.

Perfect for those times when "Xbox, don't film me in my underpants and send the images to advertisers" isn't recognised by the console.

Are you not also trusting the system will continue to recognize and provide for the enforcement of prenuptial agreements? Seems like a silly argument to make ... regardless, the law provides for a 50/50 split precisely because each party legally owns 50% of everything accumulated during the marriage. That principle

In t.v. shows and urban myths, sure. In reality, everything you said is complete bullshit.

eh ... For 99% of people a prenup is a waste of time and money to create. If you don't have a substantial amount of money (i.e. you are not part of the 1%), don't worry about it. You already get to keep everything you owned prior to the marriage (including money if you keep it separate from marital accounts). All a

Just keep in mind the author's probably never been to kentucky. Bourbon balls, derby pie, mutton barbeque, the hot brown ... for god's sake, Fried Chicken. There's some excellent food from this state, to say nothing of our generous gift of a certain heavenly beverage. If nothing else we can at least rest easy that

Saying Skyline is the representative example is like saying McDonald's is the gold standard for a cheeseburger.