Satan and God are actually pretty tight.
Satan and God are actually pretty tight.
The whole Republican Party has gone anti-semantic. I mean, Trump is two years into an all-out assault on meaning itself.
Well, it’s more than the initial situation I described :) As an adult, there are not really that many scenarios (it was more common in high school with shared locker rooms and group things like dance competitions).
“Sleep paralysis” is what they always say about this stuff, because it’s considered unprofessional for scientists to say “hmm, it sounds like that person is what we in the business call ‘kookoo for cocoa puffs’.”
I don’t know why you give a shit.
They have gay sex in parliament!? Sign me up!
Yeah... there’s no way Disney would’ve allowed that. It’s surprising that they actually cast a Chinese actress, nevermind trying to convince them to cast one in her 50s regardless of how perfect she is lol.
The central proposition, as stated by others on this thread, is that transpeople bring an emotional weight and/or experience to playing a trans character that a cis-gender actor can’t. My thought is that the entire job of professional actors is to inhabit a role whether or not they have exact or similiar experience to…
Please, tell me more about the emasculating eugenics. Are our precious bodily fluids at risk?
You put words to a feeling I haven’t been able to pinpoint. I keep seeing men say “don’t trust allies, not even me” and you’re spot on - they’re performing in some bizarre way that allows them to not be accountable and not give up any power. Thank you so much for this comment.
An apology for an act that was wrong is not the same thing as saying “I am trash”.
Julie Chu will obviously be played by Emma Stone.
Also men, everyone needs to step up and maybe people need to pursue their Oscar ambitions through other ways.
Yeah, I can totally see how the story developed the way it did, for both Jezebel and the New York Times. For better or worse, there is a credibility gap here. Jezebel will always (or at least for the foreseeable future) be associated with a family of websites that did things like publish a celebrity’s sex tape without…
What I would like to know is why this is even a story on Jezebel right now? It feels to me the same way CNN inserts itself into Trump stories. This individual came forward in a non-linear way and, in that process, went around Jezebel.
Yeah, but that’s not how journalism ethics works. The story had credibility but the reporting.... didn’t. No real sources, no real facts to report. I get that was incredibly frustrating for Jezebel (and the other ex-gawker sites), but that doesn’t give them a license to just keep stirring the pot publicly on the hopes…
I will not condemn a man on rumor alone.
If the rumors prove to be true no one at Jezebel gets to gloat. They were beyond reckless in how they handled (and continue to handle) this story. The NYT are the ones that put in the work to actually get to the truth, not just putting out a call for someone to do their jobs for them.
She is probably going to remain freakishly hot, blonde and white for an annoyingly long time which means that no matter how shitty her music is she will remain plastered all over the front page of the internet.