pretty sure the vast vast majority of his fans are women

I don’t get the snark regarding Amanda Seyfried’s eggs.

Seconded. The biological clock is very real for some women and it’s worth acknowledging. I hit 30 and suddenly very much wanted a baby, even though I hadn’t really wanted one before. That came with it a whole host of issues surrounding career decisions, healthcare choices, relationship questions, financial decisions.…

This. If you want to use your body to make babby, it makes sense that you would stress out about the lady body’s well-documented tendency to stop making babby with age. Snarking on those people who worry about that in the name of feminism is bonkers.

Sure, but that kind of defection is rare these days and there’s a ton of vetting before a candidate ever gets close enough to a senate position. The party tends to weed out non-authoritarians at that level so it’s more of an outlying case than an active consideration.

After Trump goes to prison

Why would China defend North Korea?

... what nuclear power would come to the defense of North Korea in a NUCLEAR exchange?

I assume that a bunch of guys like Manafort, Stone, etc., will take the fall and Trump will get off scot free.

Except China doesn’t give NEAR enough shits about NK to nuke someone on their behalf. They’d mobilize their army, sure; incessant saber-rattling for years, definitely. But they’re not stupid. They only even talk to each other because they’re both the only Communist bulwarks left in E Asia.

No, it would not. Cool heads would prevail. However, NK capital would be reduced to atomic rubble, and perhaps millions would die there.

If they are already avoiding the courthouses then who is ICE arresting there? Why would ICE even be lurking there?

I like to think she killed Vince Foster because she was having an affair with him...and he’s Chelsea’s real dad...ooooOOOooo..Didn’t see that coming, did you? HA.

Thank you. Anyone who doesn’t realize this is an embarrassment is too snugly ensconced in their anti-Trump media bubble.

No man, it’s the disappointment that comes with having a lot of respect for someone, and then having that person demonstrate that she’s either another cynical infotainment hack, or too dumb to predict the kind of backlash she’s getting. Because right now right-wingers are laughing their asses off at her and even…

When I do have her on I end up having a conversation with the TV that’s like “Rachel, we know, you just said that.” “Rachel...we get it.” “What is this about again?”

I think she tells people who already agree with her what they want to hear, and makes everyone involved feel smart

Agreed. I used to catch her podcast occasionally, but since the election her reporting has really gone downhill. There’s way to much of the Russian boogeyman innuendo without any actual facts to support it. If the equivalent of peeing hookers “dossier” was about Hillary, she would never have reported on it as if it…

It can make watching her a bit trying, the neverending expositions at the beginning of her show. Because she repeats herself over and over like her audience is slow or something.

Oh fuck off. You know exactly why the fuck you added that ‘(seriously).’ to the end of your tweet: because under normal circumstances our first instinct would be to think that it was exactly what it was: a couple of pages that didn’t reveal anything damning. You can pass the buck to the network for that ridiculous…