It's nice to see Egypt truly depicted in all it's Anglo-Saxon glory

Stuff You Should Know did a podcast on it. It's pretty fascinating. (Edit! Found: http://www.stuffyoushouldknow.com/podcasts/how-h…)

I think he caused over $20K in damages. The house had a Venetian plaster finish.

Me too!! I wish there would have been some night shots of Nonbei Yokocho..

I think that money is actually restitution, not a fine. A fine can't be that high on a misdemeanor. But apparently the neighbor had some fancy schmancy plaster on his house that got damaged so the bill is pretty high.

If I had to guess, "telling his side of the story" probably plays a role. Some of these guys feel that they were justified or driven to it and don't want to get painted as some random nut. Or they want the infamy of being in the news for a lot longer or to torment the surviving victims or the relatives of the dead.

they were totally cool with it though (there's a deleted bit where he jokes casually about it with an antelope)

But then the nutrients from the corpses "trickled down" to feed the grass, so it's OK when those in charge consume their subjects for their own benefit.

http://roygbiv.jezebel.com/texas-bra-shop…

I don't know what lilrock's issues are, but this isn't the first time that I've seen her get heavily invested in defending something both pointless and completely indefensible.

I often wonder that. I feel like there's so many cases of shooters who just off themselves after they're done, but there's also a good portion who get taken into custody. But I think death is too good a fate for someone who kills children (children he's the uncle of, according to one article), so he deserves a super…

This is how.

Yep. I don't think my mom ever looked through my phone when I was in high school a decade ago, but we definitely had camera phones (they were the hot new thing) and I knew plenty of people who sent each other racy photos. We couldn't make videos on our phones though. The parents who found out punished their kids,…

Sorry to interrupt your little narrative, but I already stated that if it were harassment, then that was a valid charge to bring (but I'm sure you were too busy with the copypasta to actually read my full comment).

So, your argument is that it's child pornography because he was asked to stop? In order to have a discussion with you, I need to see what your ideas/opinions are. I've already read the news articles, the police statement, and the statutes regarding child pornography and sexual offenses in Virginia. Perhaps this link…

Good talk.

Technically its distribution of child pornography to a minor. regardless if the sender is another minor.

Why is anyone wasting time on consensual relationships among minors? Shouldn't these guys be busy prosecuting ADULTS making child porn to sell, ADULTS sexting minors, real sexual harassment, and molestation?

Also, since when do moms just head straight to the courthouse to deal with family matters? Did she skip the talk…

The only thing that stops a bad guy with an underage dick pic is a good guy with an underage dick pic.

Totally agreed. This was about the least scary thing ever. Real living people on the internet are FAR scarier than this.