Scynix
Scynix
Scynix

Rinzler was voiced by Bruce Boxleitner, who was literally the actor who played Tron and subsequently has voiced all animated versions as well. If going purely by his (two?) lines in the movie, he's definitely Tron. Plus, there's the whole "Tron, what happened to you?" sequence.

Depends on if its actually a good deal. I'd actually really like to play Soul Sacrifice, but I've got a PSP1000 and theres just no good reason for me to buy a Vita. My PS3 is also an original, and it has trouble playing everything from The Last Of Us onward, so getting both would be nice if it was actually a

The first thing you learn in Debate classes is that playing devils advocate, whether or not you actually support the view, still causes people to look at you differently and more often than not as if you were the enemy.

No, I mean count your blessings its not a walking butt made of butts that gyrate to a rhythmic dubstep butt melody.

I think the title needs to be changed to "All CCG's & TCG's with mulligan rules can be cruel".

Here's a thought, the Mordesh aren't human, they're aliens. Maybe their butts just move that way?

I completely agree. In what I can only assume is an attempt to be "unique" they end up picking the most ridiculous ending you could think of, and it leaves the rest of the anime/manga feeling worse off for it.

Thankfully he's not the only writer. If he was, I wouldn't be on Kotaku.

I wasn't defending this game, I was defending sliding morality scales. I promise Luke doesn't need you to defend him, he's been writing garbage on this site for years, one person isn't going to change that.

"Has anyone ever enjoyed a sliding morality scale in an open-world game? "

A good percentage of people don't have it. We wouldn't survive as a species if everyone was susceptible to scaring easily.

How the heck are you still a writer? I haven't read a single good article by you in longer than I can even remember at this point.

I don't know if that's it. People keep dumping money on Penny Arcade for everything they try to kickstart, despite the fact -they dont need the money-. They do it because they want other people to put up the starting cost, and refuse to do it themselves. And people keep doing it. So why not Amplitude?

Which, of note, is one of those games that *I* personally don't care for. But that's just my own taste, and not any kind of factual statement that "violence is bad". I thought the Postal games were extremely distasteful, but I wouldn't berate the producers for making them, even if I don't care for them, because they

I don't think he wanted to pass judgement, either. But if he had "taken a stance against violence", that's taking a stance against the way most games are produced, which isn't practical at all.

I admire your naivete. Legitimately. But the world doesn't work that way. Most people do jobs that they disagree with. Most people do -things- they don't agree with or condone.

Except no one questions the idea "sex sells" in games, either. Not that I've ever seen. Violence sells just as much as sex does. In a market flooded with titles the most reliable product is going to be a sex filled violent murder fest. That doesn't mean we have to make every game into that, but you have to be willing

Chesty Female annoys the crap out of me more than all of the others, purely because -its working- and no one wants to point out how much it does not help the "more women should play games". This site regularly posts about the disparity between the way women and men are treated in games, and these LP's/Twitch streamers

Yes. Knights of Sidonia better do well or I'm setting everything on fire.

Occam's Razor. Someone wrote a bot that uploads tiny, randomly generated (within the confines of obvious parameters) videos and the internet wonders what the hell is going on. Nothing is going on, it's there because it can be.