ScuzzM0nkey
ScuzzM0nkey
ScuzzM0nkey

I'd say your alarm is probably right on target.

Bad news, bro, that is your Bronco...

It looked like a Michael Bay missile.

I explained in the article what spurred it. Did you miss that or not believe it? There were allegations last week that Sarkeesian lied about informing the police about harassment. A critic of hers had a person from the SFPD on audio saying they hadn't heard from Sarkeesian. That was certainly a story I felt we should

Youabian Puma

It's "refueled" with salt water, so unless you're being purposefully dense, yes, the headline is fine. Did you not read the explanation?

Well no car runs on only one component, so normally society will label them by what energy source a person will have to regularly replenish. Since the fuel cell requires replenishing of the salt water in order to extend your range, effectively fueling your vehicle, the car does run on salt water. A gasoline car does

Not trying to kiss ass here, but I do NOT consider this a 'clickbait' headline - the fact that salt water is used as an electrolyte, which be replenished like a gas tank, is the single most significant part of the story?

I explained it in detail in the post. And, yes, it doesn't strictly "run" on saltwater, the saltwater is the electrolyte in the flow battery, and the fluid that a driver would need to replenish. So, until the other components in the flow battery require replacing, an owner would be filling up with saltwater every

oh, this is easy.

I'm not sure if this is specific to where I live, but its seems to be pretty common lately to not turn on a turn signal (if at all) until the driver is 3/4 of the way through the turn. At that point it's not signaling anything, it's more announcing a celebration of almost completing the task.

Then they would have to leave room between cars, unpossible.

Funny the G-Class was in a Handicapped spot. Also...it sounds like our vigilante is a woman. Pretty Ballsy!

Not the hero we deserved but the hero we needed. Nothing less than a knight. Shining.

It should be a personal issue for everyone. Drunk driver recidivism is too common.

Why does that seem extreme to you? The 4 DUI's only mean that he was caught 4 times. It doesn't keep a tally of all the times that he didn't get caught. How many more punches do you think he has left on his "didn't kill anyone this time" card? And it won't be him. It will be some poor family in a minivan that he

I am in no way looking for public sympathy but yes, I had a close childhood friend killed by a drunk driver on a backroad earlier this summer. I see no moral difference between the punishment assigned to someone who has fired a gun randomly at a crowd of people and a person who has driven severely impaired, especially

"Littlejohn went on to say that the vehicle would be used by police officers for protection in the case of an active shooter, or if the school needs to rescue children from a fire, because no one in this situation has apparently ever heard of a fire department."

Water puts out fire, sure, but why use water when you can