It looks like a normal Vette, every dude in his 50's has one. They don’t standout, they don’t looks special. It does not qualify as an exotic even though it preforms like one.

Entry level *exotic*

Don’t get me wrong, I wouldn’t want it to become common. It’s just occasionally nice to see a manufacturer basically say: “We built this car right. It’s a finely-honed instrument. Don’t fuck with it.”

The EVO review irked me quite a bit, because of one sentence “objectively it can’t keep up with the best European stuff.”

Really?, here in New Zealand we get them with those taillights and I hate them, I really prefer the american ones

Huh? All versions of the Mustang got IRS at the same time (excluding the early 2000's Terminator), and that was before the EcoBoost became an option for the ‘Stang.

Its hard to take complaints about “cheap plastics” seriously when IT HAS A GIANT 5.0L V8 MAKING 415 HP.

“cheap plastics”

1800 sales in the first 12 months and here are the stats behind the sales. So yeah GM & FCA if you’re reading, we like Muscle cars. Put the wheel on our side and ship them over.

Fact: every British car review either grades the car as “proper” or “not proper”

I hate that they changed their name from XCAR. Carfection is so tacky.

no idea whether serious or sarcastic

Sorry but the detailing is extremely poor for Astons standards. Neither the side vents that screw up the wheelarch shape nor the unnecessarily fussy rear end/rear lights treatment nor the ghastly chrome roof pillars are working. Not even “not working well”, straight up not working. Sad thing that, since this pointless…

Oh hell no.

What about the stupid multi color c-pillar?

It looks huge.

Hipster M3.

Love, LOVE E30 M3s. That said, false. The power band is narrow, and all stacked above 3,500 rpm. Fuel pump problems, always leaking valve cover gaskets (and not very easy to get to or replace, nor is it cheap, like the one from the M20B25). Yes, the shape is quitessential BMW, but the E46 and E90/91 chassis and power…

False.