Like I explained, whether or not the totem falls at the end is irrelevant. His totem doesn't work. It's not a 'troll ending' if, regardless of what happens to the totem, it's still unclear whether or not he's in a dream.

Because an area of effect would affect someone within it's boundaries even if they didn't have line of sight with the source. And, if the person you are going to 'pounce' on is affected, you are also affected.

Crackpot conspiracy: The song they used to wake people up from dreams, as well as the song used throughout the movie as most of the soundtrack in different rerecorded ways (Non, Je Ne Regrette Rien by Edith Piaf) is 2:29 long, and when it ends, the dream is over. Inception is 2 hours, 29 minutes long, and when the…

Since you don't like long-winded comments, here's another one.

I already did. The opening scene is Cobb waking up from the dream that was Inception 1.

My apologies.

Short version: Anyone who is in the line of sight of anyone affected by bullet time is also affected.

Short version: Anyone who is in the line of sight of anyone affected by bullet time is also affected.

The extremely short version:

Being an action shooter, let's assume you aren't leisurely strolling to your next destination. Say you are passing by a hallway where people are having a slo-mo gunfight and you start running in slo-mo. You are still running, and a maximum of a couple seconds later, you're running regular speed again.

Since there continues to be confusion, let me paraphrase the video:

The statement isn't wrong, it's just not the whole thing. Player B is affected negatively because he has line of sight with A, regardless of whether it's A seeing B, B seeing A or them seeing each other.

Mostly correct. C would also be affected in your example since he can see B and B is affected. Everyone who can see anyone who is affected is also affected.

Anyone who can see anyone affected is ALSO affected, so the rates of fire for his allies would go down as well.

And now you know why I've never been able to forget that movie or it's contents.

No, they're addicted to workahol. And a chocoholic is addicted to chocohol.

A Serbian Film left an impression so deep I've yet to forget it, but that would be at least in part because of the slasher stuff. I've heard that the second Human Centipede is rather upsetting too but that's probably because of the physical horrible...ness. Hard Candy was a rough psychological one, too.

Are people really this stupid? EA is a publisher for these games, the developers of which get most of the money. And the developers are independent.

Rambo movies are all about shooting people, right? Then the opposite would be playing Rambo II: First Blood backwards. Sylvester Stallone saves a bunch of Vietnamese people with his magic bullet vacuum.

Either I'm the only one who read the entire article, I completely missed it or no one else is even remotely interested but what did you name your daughter?