She did not eviscerate him. She derailed the conversation to lecture him on trans-inclusive language, and then accused him of causing trans people to commit suicide because he was confused about trans-inclusive language.

Also, the talking point isn’t “the supreme court’s reversal of roe was radical and took away women’s rights” became “democrats think men can give birth and any language criticizing them is violence.” She did not eviscerate him. She derailed the conversation to lecture him on trans-inclusive language, and then accused…

I know nothing about her but I was wondering if the problem isn’t that no one wants to see yet another revival of an old Broadway show. Are people still even into that? Even tourists who don’t know better would probably rather go see something else, but maybe I’m wrong. 

No dear. I am not a person who menstruates, gives birth or does anything else. I am a WOMAN. Period. Full stop.

If that’s what Bette Midler was trying to say, you said it better.

I’m fine with “women and birthing people” or “women and menstruators” or any other term people want, but I’m not ready to give up on woman/women because women are still struggling to achieve equal rights and the word’s existence doesn’t preclude that of people with other gender identities, but they can be listed in…

The New York Times Op Ed actually made some really fantastic points and everyone should give it a read. It’s not merely about using inclusive language, its about basically eliminating an entire gender, one that has already struggled for equal rights throughout history. Both sides can be wrong. 

The complete lack of prosecutions for it shows it pretty much already is.

I would say women should refuse sex as a protest, but then the SC would make rape legal.

Yep. You can’t write about the fall of Roe without talking about the part that modern feminists played in it. The Bernie obsession in 2016 is one part, the other being how they neglected abortion rights and took them for granted, instead focusing on other superfluous fights while conservatives played the long game.

No the Democrats don’t control the Senate thanks to two DINO’s who would rather watch the country burn if they can stand on the top of the ash heap.

It’s very weird to see Jezebel rewrite it’s attitude to the 2016 elections. Most of the writers have left now, but this site was decidedly anti Hillary Clinton.

It already failed. Most Americans don’t realize it yet, though.

If I was beyond horribly disgusted, I would find a different website to read. You should try that, it will probably be much safer for you.

If your bar for danger is dissenting opinions then no place is safe so long as it's occupied by anyone who thinks.

It’s not transphobic to question the fairness of trans women competing against biological women. That’s called critical thinking or debate. It’s not inherently transphobic to have questions about something. Saying that is just a method to shut down meaningful debate.

The conversation around this always seems to focus on the wrong gender. Men’s sports only exist because we created Women’s sports. The solution is just to correct that definitional mistake. Make “Swimming” with no rules on who can compete and “Women’s Swimming” with tight rules on entry. Nobody has a right to win.…

You really don’t know?  

Because a biologically female body would not perform well against biologically male bodies, in most sports. On the other hand, a biologically male body will perform very well against a biologically female body in any sport.