The internet is by definition anonymous Mr/Mrs. GetOffMyLawn ... is that Irish?

And the fact that his consecutive games played streak stood for more than half a decade.

To find out if <insert race> people have too many assholes in the group, lets compile a list of everytime you have dealt with an asshole <insert race> person. Can't wait to find out what conclusion we are going to reach.

You assume this list is credible. You assume other countries have a comparable list. You assume the situation in other countries is comparable. Why?

if by our's you mean Cameroon's then yes

Pretty certain when they lose two in a row to mid table teams the same set of facts will be rearranged to support the inverse conclusion. So are the perils of results based analysis

one day Americans will realize the reason a diseases isn't cured yet has as little to do with awareness or donations as wet t-shirts do

Well that was predictable. Its not clear to me what the Jezebel post achieved. This is something you deal with between you and your management. The people who post this images only do it to illicit a response, the more you respond the more they will do it. The above post is essentially a trophy kill for them. If point…

Well, the video doesn't show intent. Also I never stated whether I believed it was accident or not. I was simply responding to your claim that anytime a car runs a person over it had to be driver's fault. Unlike you, I have the ability to withhold judgement when the evidence is inconclusive. Only Stewart knows what…

Any system that sufficiently addresses the problem will almost have to have unintended consequences that Gawker is unwilling to accept. Some website are removing comments entirely for example Popular Science. You could also ban posting images.

Funny how a guy can run over another guy and the person who's fault it is is the guy that got ran over.

well what happened is unclear however I'm responding to comments that suggest that even if it was an accident he should go to jail. Those commenters are saying he should go to jail under all circumstances. I'm simply providing one circumstance were that wouldn't be the case. I have no idea what your problem is

but that wouldn't be an accident would it? You said even if it was an accident he should go to jail so yeah what should your sentence be in the above scenario?

so if you're driving home from work and i jump in front of your car and you run me over I'm guessing the whole thing would be your fault

"even if its an accident, its manslaughter... if he sees no jail time we will just assume being a celebrity is all that matters"

what do you eat? How much carbs are you eating

The analogy isn't referring to the solitary nature of masturbation. The relevant property is masturbation being a watered down proxy of something else that sometimes takes the place of that other thing or at the very least retard your desire to seek the real thing. There are many examples in modern life where we have…

So does facebook post every new article from every news site your follow... if not how does it decide what to post ? how does it decide what is a "big" article?

Sorry if I was too harsh in my response. I was trying to say that your post doesn't explain why you follow them only that you encountered the link on facebook. If the point is that you encountered the link because you follow them then sorry I misunderstood.

I honestly don't understand what you just said. When I want to browse sploid, i go to sploid. Sometimes I find it from links on gawker or elsewhere but why exactly would I want to join them on facebook? Are there people out there who need to make sure they don't miss any sploid posts the second it comes out?