I want to reply your post but I have no idea what you are arguing for or against. I guess you think I'm saying internationals are not important when I was only saying it is not a significant source of income for players.

the point isn't that they don't get bonuses it is that that is not how they make a living. RVP makes over $20m at United, $30k win bonuses doesn't factor into anything. My original point was that I had no idea why the OP was bringing up money as a criticism of players who allegedly don't want to play the third place…

sorry but no one makes a living playing at the world cup. They make their money paying club football. You're not paying a penny for the world cup and your sense of entitlement is more objectionable than whatever you think the "idiot" players are saying

the article is foolish but I take offense to you insulting the players since none of them said they don't want to play this game and I have no idea why you're taking about what the players are hired to do side they are not employed by the national team. They make their living playing club football.

this is a spectacularly stupid idea

If you are Cleveland are you encouraged or discouraged?

Did Cleveland gain a Lebron or did Miami lose a Lebron?

serious question.. is free agency is a team sport?

well done sir

like which teams?

about half the team are Africans so there is an African influence but they are not as physical as most African teams.... these generalizations are not concocted out of pure malice. There is a basis in reality

Yes, they are strong and fast, but limiting your description of CAF teams to praising their physicality (while ignoring their technical strength) is similar to the language used to describe black NFL players (namely, quarterbacks).

yeah what does Mercedes know about their truck anyway... can someone let then know a gawker commenter begs to differ

the so called negativity you sense is called common sense. No one is threatening my job and even if someone was I don't see what bearing that has on my argument. My job involves getting rid of other jobs. I manage a development team and I have made the case to hire in China for financial reasons. So no I'm not against…

no it's not expensive, it is impossible. Complexity exponentially increases tail risks and bugs. Humans are still the ones designing and writing the code

look productivity is higher now and there are fewer net jobs available to the population than there was 50 years ago. As I said I am not saying this is a good or bad thing and you may not care about what displaced workers do but someone has to care since a large population of people with no means of making a living…

there is no law of nature that says technology must create more jobs than it eliminates. How many more net jobs did ez pass create? Also it's awfully naive to think toll booth workers displaced by ez pass wouldn't simply just go to school to become computer programmers instead. I'm not making a value judgement about…

which sport exactly can you watch on dvr after you know how it ended especially if you can just watch the highlights

sorry no I'm just a software developer with little tolerance for bullshit self delusion

"For every job they eliminate they probable create 10 more."