SamsClubWhoreHouse
SamsClubWhoreHouse
SamsClubWhoreHouse

For all practical purposes there is no reason to consider why people physically find white women more attractive as the op I originally replied to stated. If black women where most attractive that will still be as vulnerable to constructionist explanations as any other preference.

Hmmm okay so the minority of men who find black women attractive are responsible for their sexualization... ok that's plausible. I find it hard to believe but I don't have any good arguments to oppose the possibility so you may very well be right. Now is it possible to explain why black men would do this to their own

So have you just fucking examined where your preference for fine dark skin black men came from?

Instead of homework you could also just give me the answer. Also interesting definition of closed minded your have there.

Yeah so no rape is mostly about a desire for sex if it wasn't we wouldn't see a steep drop off with increasing age of the victim nor would chemical castration be effective since that eliminates the sex part. A 65 year old is simply not as likely to be a victim of rape as a 25 year old even when you control for

Can you just tell me what the black feminists have to say about the apparent contradiction of black women being considered unattractive and then over sexualized? It's kind of a straightforward contradiction.

The idea that no one will ever have racial preferences in physical appearance is pretty inconsistent with what every one of us knows about ourselves. We could simply admit it exists and don't get offended by it. As a black man there is no offense to be taken when a woman indicates she prefers white, or Asian men or

Is there a shortage of black men out there?

In theory always agreeing with the white perspective or always disagreeing with it are both worse alternatives than one that is selective simply because no perspective is always right on every issue.

even if his mind resided in the darkest places of mental illness.

But we already do something like that. Every women's league if it wants to continue in the spirit it was established must devise some set of rules for determining who is female. The Olympics has dealt with this issue and continues to deal with it.

OK so its not obvious however consider why a dispassionate observer would choose to rule against letting trans women into women's leagues. As I said, we are still not completely sure exactly what it means to be male (or female), the essence of maleness and all its physiological implications and consequences. Given

THIS SHIT IS ALL ARBITRARY. That's the point!

So is there more variation among the sexes than there is between them or not with the implication that the variation between the sexes is irrelevant? If that is the case then I can't understand why adding a woman (or man in a female dominated situation) to the mix should add significantly more positive variation than

The simple answer is that separate facilities exist simply to keep men away from naked women. It doesn't exist to keep straight men from gay men, straight women from lesbian women or even any women away from any men.

Sounds like you're a better nfl coach than Andy Reid. I understand the redskins have an opening.

How could you possibly know when the play came in ... are you dialed into the chiefs radios ?

There is nothing in that article that suggests it isn't a money grab. All I read is that the chiefs should've know he would kill his entire family and forced him to retire

I don't think the race of a racist matters as much as you think it does.

It is far more likely that there is a lot more going on here especially with the athletes than the simple explanation that all these athletes are in favor of the massacre of millions of Jews and are proud to tell you about it.