even if his mind resided in the darkest places of mental illness.

But we already do something like that. Every women's league if it wants to continue in the spirit it was established must devise some set of rules for determining who is female. The Olympics has dealt with this issue and continues to deal with it.

OK so its not obvious however consider why a dispassionate observer would choose to rule against letting trans women into women's leagues. As I said, we are still not completely sure exactly what it means to be male (or female), the essence of maleness and all its physiological implications and consequences. Given…

THIS SHIT IS ALL ARBITRARY. That's the point!

So is there more variation among the sexes than there is between them or not with the implication that the variation between the sexes is irrelevant? If that is the case then I can't understand why adding a woman (or man in a female dominated situation) to the mix should add significantly more positive variation than…

The simple answer is that separate facilities exist simply to keep men away from naked women. It doesn't exist to keep straight men from gay men, straight women from lesbian women or even any women away from any men.

Sounds like you're a better nfl coach than Andy Reid. I understand the redskins have an opening.

How could you possibly know when the play came in ... are you dialed into the chiefs radios ?

There is nothing in that article that suggests it isn't a money grab. All I read is that the chiefs should've know he would kill his entire family and forced him to retire

I don't think the race of a racist matters as much as you think it does.

It is far more likely that there is a lot more going on here especially with the athletes than the simple explanation that all these athletes are in favor of the massacre of millions of Jews and are proud to tell you about it.

This +1000. I always try to stress this point when I argue on Gawker sites. There are a few facts we know of....

You don't blow a 5th round draft pick on a punter with a team with as many holes as the Vikings have.

Lets start with Viagra itself which according to multiple studies(here and here) is effective for women and is being prescribed to women.

And unmarried women retain access to their libido enhancers so this is clearly not about extra marital sex which the church forbids for both sexes... my previous posts explains this in greater detail

If someone does I think the church should be able to make an exception on that case but I doubt it would because it may assume that that would be used as a gaping loop hole and because regardless of why bc is prescribed it still prevents birth.

If contraceptive vasectomies are covered then yes you have a point especially if female tube tying isn't.

The insurance company doesn't have the same interests in lower prices for itself or for the entire marketplace as you or the government does. The insurance company simply passes on higher prices to your disinterested employer who first spreads it around a larger employee base and then takes it out on you with lower…

I have no idea why the "hormonal" qualification, the church isn't that making that distinction?

Male bc exists and so does female libido medications. Your reasoning is simply suggesting that women are being discriminated against because they don't have penises and in a sense that is certainly most unfair. In an ideal world everyone should have one penis and one vagina and periods.