Don't really find that ironic since it is consistent with their ideology. Viagra is the opposite of bc. If they were against both that will be illogical. Also if they were against the female versions of viagra that would be inconsistent

You're all missing the more salient point. The more important question is who is covering BC good for ? The answer is not the people who need it the most.

Also great for your immune system? heroine the catch is only in moderation.

Not a dunk

But isn't Obama just as white as he is black.

But subcutaneous fat and the more dangerous belly fat are strongly co-related. Anyway, the reason why we should treat everyone with respect certainly doesn't depend on whether or not the latest research on fat concludes obesity is life extending or shortening.

But thats my point, tanking is a concept alive and well in the hearts and minds of the media because its something to debate and may be within perennially good teams simply because they maintain a healthy skepticism about the competition. In practice I doubt it happens in the NBA or NFL in any significant way.

I think franchise QBs are almost as important as franchise players in the NBA because of parity across the league. The QB is the one position where the difference between the top and bottom 10 is greatest and has a disproportionate impact on the game. There are 11 players on offense yes but the QB contributes a lot…

So why doesn't the nfl have this tanking problem even though it routinely over nights franchise QBs to the worst team without the messy uncertainty of a lottery?

I enjoyed that and I'm African.

Ok so I guess I have no idea what it means for something to be a social construction. Corn by your definition is a social construction. And I believe if you look at the entire genome there is more variation within humans than between humans and chimps so that would make the human chimp distinction a social…

I'm aware of the fact that Africans have the greatest genetic diversity my point is that that fact doesn't mean certain traits cannot be overwhelmingly more common in Africans than non Africans and vice versa. I used physical traits as an example because that is most obvious. Plotting the skin tone or leg length or…

Whoever you're responding to could be a racist troll so I'm not necessarily supporting whatever their case was but just wanted to point out that if your theory on African genetic variation is exactly as you state it we'd expect to find Africans with the same physical characteristics found in all other races.... we…

Of course that is why no one thinks dark skinned Indians or really tan Italians are African. Racial categories is a proxy for genetics although it is less than perfect it is still very descriptive.

Are the different breeds of dogs social constructions? The existence of subgroups of races or mixed race people doesn't mean race is a social construction. Also the idea that there is absolutely no consistency is untrue. No one thinks the Roma people are African so at least that is consistent. Most naive Africans…

But race is based on genetics... just like species are based on genetics. Even though no one can tell you what that means we know a leopard and cheetah aren't the same thing and the categories bulldog and a golden retriever aren't "social constructions" whatever that means

But race is based on genetics... just like species are based on genetics. Even though no one can tell you what that means we know a leopard and cheetah aren't the same thing and the categories bulldog and a golden retriever aren't "social constructions" whatever that means

Yeah so no that is not the obvious casual factor. It could be a casual factor but its not the most obvious. I will like to see studies that show that black and white women of similar stress levels are similarly obese. That will go a long way to show that the stress factor isn't simply co-relational.

I always found this social construction idiocy ridiculous as if whatever that made my skin darker, my legs longer and my nose flatter also decided it wasn't allowed to implement any other adaptions that would not agree with the sensibilities of the humans it expects to occupy the earth in 2000s ... what exactly will…

Are you considering this explanation because you'd prefer no genetic differences or because you are aware of scientific evidence that precludes any genetic differences?