I'm glad this isn't legal. What a gross human being.

He was using a LONG LENS you fucking scab, for the purpose of snapping these shots, without which he COULD NOT HAVE seen up their skirts. Ergo, nothing was "on display".

Because by existing in public a woman grants permission to be plastered on the Internet.

The comments on the website are just disconcerting, as are some of the greys here. Some men really do believe that this is okay? Really? I'm leaving my house when it's safe.

Really dude really you couldn't just look at porn you had to be a creep and give the rest of us men a bad name didn't you.

*Ahem* FREEEE SPEEEEEECH!

"If I could do it at 18 with a guy..."
Yeah but Charlie, that wasn't just any guy...

So Charlie Hunnam and Dakota Johnson are going to be the next Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson? Because that's what I feel like is happening as the people involved with this movie keep waving their chemistry in my face.

Keep in mind, the signs are pretty small, and the brushes to write with are about an inch thick. There isn't room to put anything remotely readable that's much longer than what is already on the sign.

Not to be a wet blanket, but this story doesn't seem very funny to me (all right, that is being a wet blanket); and if the man in question were my father I'd probably be worried for his health after he got tased. Even if he does seem a bit, um, unreasonable.

Here's the problem.

We expect police officers to respect the law and to act with restraint. There is no hypocrisy in that. The taser is over used - period. It was meant to replace a gun with non-lethal alternative - meaning it should only be used when you would have otherwise had to have used a gun. However, it has too often become a…

Tazing can be lethal, so your statements about using "non-lethal measures" don't really apply. As for your question "at what point does it become the cop's responsibility to take the risk of being shot over tasing some goober who couldn't be arsed to cooperate"? Any time there is not a clear and present danger. A cop…

What is there to argue about; re: the act itself? We're (hopefully) at the point as a society where we agree that rape is bad.

And good for Vanderbilt, for responding appropriately to the accusations (suspending and dismissing players involved) and for, apparently, providing the support that this young woman needs to continue to attend school there.

You do know that men and boys can be raped too, right? If your son were raped or you were raped, would you want it to be written in an indictment as if you did it with the man? And, I used a man in my hypothetical because you're the sort who probably says that a boy would want any sexual encounter with a woman because…

It is much more accurately described sex act inflicted upon a person who does not or cannot consent. The "with" implies there was mutual participation whereas "upon" conveys that this was something done to the person and forced on them in violation of their physical integrity. Even if your phrasing is the currently…

I didn't think this could be any more morally reprehensible than I previously thought, but once again, humanity keeps restoring my faith that there is no such thing as the bottom of the moral barrel. As a black woman, I am so disgusted that a black man would inflict upon anyone a race based sex crime. Do they not know…

I just wanted to write a note of support to the alleged victim, as I read that she stayed at Vandy & began her senior year classes. If the allegations is true (which it unfortunately looks that way if there's video evidence) then I admire this woman's ability to hold her head up and go back to classes. I hope she's…

Yes, this pedantic, and yes, you otherwise call it rape again and again. But I still think you need to change this sentence: "The woman was reportedly unconscious while Vandenburg had sex with her." He didn't "have sex" with her. He raped her. Stick an "allegedly" in there if you must. But call it what it actually was.