SagarikaLumos
SagarikaLumos
SagarikaLumos

Excuse me, I had a brain fart there. I do know that it was the only one flying for a time during the Comet's grounding and before the 707 basically took over.

The F-22 and the F-35 are both sexy, as airplanes go. The Soviets did build some pretty planes, but they had their share of uglies. They built the Tu-104, which was the first commercial passenger jet in service and a looker. The Soviets also built the Tu-144, which was a graceful-looking widowmaker. Most of their

That's cool, but violates the PCH rule by expecting payment for work that is already done without evidence that it was done well. Also, I have a friend who's had several Fox Mustangs, and they ALWAYS have cracks at the tops of the A-pillars from engine torque. The stock 300 lb-ft. was already more than this body

This proves again what I've known all along: the problem with Hummers isn't anything with the vehicle itself, but the ill will that it brings out of other drivers. Even the author of the piece can't help himself.

Suddenly, you look like a big idiot. He played college ball at Tennessee.

Did anyone check to see if it's an attempted selloff after a Top Gear challenge? It seems like a bad enough idea to have been theirs.

I actually prefer it to the dopes who say "torques" as a noun.

Any DA that would put her up for that deserves to himself be hog-tied.

More like base 4-cyl that's only hitting on 3. 87 hp is well short of today's traffic.

Nice, but I don't like driving something that I have to floor all the time, and this is just such an animal. It needs the turbo badly.

I actually saw a white Gremlin X yesterday in the wild. Probably the first one I'd seen in months at least.

I disagree. I'd consider all body styles equal here, and the price a good bit north of realistic for any.

I love where they're going with that, but the price is just too damn high. CP

There's no telling how badly the "conversion" work was done. CP and definite PCH.

Magnetorheological not cool enough for you?

I don't even know what to say about this, even as a sometime fan of both sides there. This sounds like a match made in Hell.

Very good point. I guess what I was really getting at is that for me, even a diamond's beautiful refractions is a weak second fiddle to the near magic of corrective lenses.

Actual most beautiful example of refraction: the sudden total sharpness of a new pair of glasses.

No, people on here always say something looks like a "Lambo," and the burned supercar is already such a common thing, too.

Really? Smells like a Lambo to me.