Fair enough. I can't say I've ever been in one. That bad though?

I feel like a hybrid is probably the best drivetrain for a taxi though. Conserves gas when at all possible and still gives some range over regular electric

Mkay, I'm going to break down your initial posts to help you understand why you sound... uninformed. Tragic though your situation was, it shouldn't turn you into a blithering douche.

NEW WORLD ORDER! NEW WORLD ORDER! DENVER AIRPORT! BLACK HELICOPTERS! BARBARA STREISAND!

I take it you have had some poor experiences, Mr. Schreiber?

You have my Jeep? The picture is actually of mine about a week ago haha. Yes, they are wonderful and although it doesn't get off the pavement as much as I'd prefer, I have yet to ever get it stuck.

Were those the ones rated at like 8mpg? I have quite the lust for one of those because of how truly bizarre they are

Here's a list of cars I have driven, ones I have owned marked with an asterisk:

Yes, but best handling FWD car ever. And it was incredibly light. That's Lotus's thing, isn't it?

True. But what wasn't an anemic smog-choked slug that was a shadow of its former self in the late '70s?

That would be the exact opposite of this question then, wouldn't it?

Ok, the question was not what car you like the least, rather what car disregards its company's history. The BMW X6M or Porsche Cayenne (two vehicles I rather enjoy, mind you) would have been acceptable answers. The Ion? Well, it was made out of plastic and was kind of quirky. That was Saturn's thing. The Saturn…

Wasn't the history of the SS badge, at least originally when you could get it on a L6/Powerglide combo, to take bland cars and make them less so?

What? No that thing was crazy economical. I believe the 1.2 TDI could get something like 2L/100km. Also, it was way ahead of its time and was built out of aluminum.

A brand new 2012 M3 starts around $60k. Learn you some.

If I remember right, the Toyota Tacoma's bed is composite.

And that's the first time I've ever heard of this awesome beast. I must have it!

Yes, the Ford Flex is a fantastic car company. So misunderstood as it lingers on Ford lots where those less informed have left it, instead of the Ford Flex, LLC lots that dot the nation.

I might be the only person who likes the Five Hundred/Taurus duo. As long as you avoid the CVT/3.0 combination, they are a fairly well put together car that is great on long distance trips. Or so I've read anyway.

From the A-pillar back it really looks quite alright. The front end is so, so awful though. Damn that's ugly. Maybe if Boxster headlight weren't used it would be more palatable.