Lesnar didn’t wriggle out of contractual obligations, option to take a fight was agreed upon when he re-signed.

Guy wants to be a dick and make money, who said anything about playing? I get what you’re trying to say here, but ultimately it’s a rare/valuable card whether people can functionally/logically play with it or not.

Why does it matter? 5,000% doesn’t mean he’d buy it from you for $1,530,000, it means he’d buy it for $1,000 and then hoard it for that price.

Maybe if humans weren’t such a f***ed up bunch we wouldn’t have to have so many restrictions. They have to think of every possible example so that some freak doesn’t find a loophole and ruin it for everyone.

Thank you for being a friend.

Aw shucks.

Hey, don’t assume others are ignorant just because you are.

Sweet, Link shits soft-serve ice cream! Handy.

Woops. My loss, but at least I will know for next time. Thanks!

Woops. My loss, but at least I will know for next time. Thanks!

Looks like 11.99 to me. :(

Looks like 11.99 to me. :(

How is your situation comparable to someone who refuses to buy a new system and is wanting devs to produce games for older systems?

No, I mean the forward progress of only having to develop a game for one system.

It’s disappointing people are still buying PS3 games and hindering forward progression, but it is what it is.

‘2 years old’ is nothing for Sims games.

Andre Wagassi.

Not really a good analogy. Besides, I like Pokemon. Why would I not click? Turned out it wasn’t as interesting as I hoped. That’s all.

Common sense would tell you that that isn’t an example of common sense, it’s an opinion. Sorry the world can’t be all rainbows and puppies; sometimes people find things boring and voice that opinion. That’s not a matter of a lack of common sense.

The article’s about Halo and Pokemon. What difference does it make if I said Halo sucks? Doesn’t change the fact that I clicked on it because it was Pokemon.

Another person who can’t handle people having opposing opinions.