Not if they didn’t win enough. It’s not like everyone gets rich doing that.

It’s similar to how some bands record albums on tape and disown protools.

Hell, this is true for a lot of people who aren’t even in e-sports.

I think it’s a little lame that license owners of yesterday aren’t thrown a bone or, as you said, at least a discount. I understand it costs money to update these games even if there’s no changes being made—just adapting them for new systems is likely costly—but it doesn’t mean I want to buy a game 5 times, no matter…

art style goes a long way if that’s what you’re looking for in a game, though. Everyone is different.

I don’t think $100 is bad, but I’m not convinced they have enouhg of a selection for it to be worth it.......yet. But taking that out of the equation it’s a reasonable price for the technology used.

All due respect, it’s not Sony’s job to be mindful of your budgeting a portion of your money to their competitor. That’s your choice. You ultimately paid double for gaming to begin with as you can’t really use two consoles at once. So naturally things are going to be more expensive.

She’s amazing. What was this article about again?

That is a wonderful idea TBH. While I’m not wild about that service it’s a good ‘take it or leave it, better than nothing’ solution.

So you don’t think our digital PS Classics titles will even work?

People actually care if they’re sponsored? C’mon. It’s a skit on a comedy show.

“non-gamers”

“BUT I WANT IT... FREE...NOW”

Ever think that maybe......maybe other people do?

You’re referring to an ultra niche sector of gaming.

Glad someone said it. I was looking for a non-abrasive way to say “you’re a fucking moron” and the word ‘ignorant’ somehow escaped me.

Scar XIII

This is great.

They are.