RedHotFuzz
RedHotFuzz
RedHotFuzz

What dream? Buying a bunch of cars that you’re not driving and you’re probably not even looking at them much anymore because they’re all jammed together? I appreciate cars, but not when they’re just tossed in a shed and nothing is done with them. I’d rather have 10 cars in good running order that I can enjoy than 250

That sprinkler scene goes on for eternity. The guy was probably so proud of making it he wanted it to just never stop.

Maybe the Alfa you have that was built 22 years ago has little to do with the current ones, and yours can be completely reliable while newer ones are piles of shit? I think both are possible,  right? No need to be defensive. I had a perfectly reliable 2005 Cooper S. By all accounts the next generates a piece of trash.

I was really looking forward to Alfa’s return if just to break up the gray monotony of BMW Camrys and Mercedes Highlanders around here, but you are way more forgiving than I am if 80 days downtime in 14 months is acceptable for a high priced sedan in the 21st Century because it’s first year of production. This is from

Look out, Mack!

If that’s the kind of everyday excitement you need in your life, the infamous Giulia Quadrifoglio can be yours for only $41,500.

Ah yes, not only one that is proven unreliable, but one ragged on by journalists, through Detroit snow (because of course), raced and abused, and might have run over a small animal, all for the low-low price of a brand new C7 with discounts or a great down payment on a C8.

I bought a GTI with a manual and if they had one as a wagon I would’ve gotten that.

“It’s a bit of a hidden thing. We argued we should keep it – but we need customers to know about it, or it will die.”

This image defeated Communism.

This guy sure does get tired of his team quickly. Bored man gets paid indeed.

There are unmolested NA Miatas for sale for $2,500 all day around here. Why take on all of the issues with this one? Perhaps for $500 and LeMons duty. 

...had only 106,000 miles on the clock.

I’m tired of all the bitching from Jalopnik staff about SUVs. A bunch of New Yorker city folk who don’t even drive everyday trying to tell the rest of America what we should be buying. Ironic since they rarely buy new cars anyways, yet want a say on what manufacturers should be building.

I’ve been a snowboard instructor since the mid-90s. The pitch I used to make was, if you’re a beginner, and if on top of that you’ll only be able to get to the mountains 5-10 days a year, then definitely start snowboarding instead of skiing. While the first couple of days may be harder, you’ll become proficient much

I’ve been in New England my whole life. Started as a skier, moved through racing, teaching, and into coaching. Due to hand injuries, can’t reliably hold/use poles anymore, so made the switch to snowboarding and I do both regularly; while I agree with you on the conditions exacerbating some of the issues boarders can

The one thing that I can say definitively is that on the rare times you encounter an insane methed-out dude (always a dude) on a ski slope, he’s always on a board (I’m looking at you Arapahoe Basin).

As a skier, my annoyance with snowboarders is riding the lifts with them and the congestion they create at the top of the lifts. They also have a a much harder time moving in flat areas. Basically, they create more traffic. But that’s it.  

Interesting read, but I don’t know if after a life of snowboarding and two days of skiing you’re in the best position either from a bias standpoint or from an experience standpoint to say whether or not banning snowboarders makes the experience better for skiiers. Plus, come ski in New England where our snow quality