RedArrrow220
Redd
RedArrrow220

The issue with charging according to the damage done to the roads by a vehicle is that fees for trucks would skyrocket, while cars would pay almost nothing.

Leclerc had the line, he was defending. It was questionable, but at the very most it was a racing incident that resulted in no damage to any car or loss of position, which is why they dug that black and white flag out. Frankly, I’m not sure anyone knew it existed.

Come on! Don’t post race results immediately after they happen!

I actually like the looks of the 124, but I couldn’t imagine actually getting one instead of a Miata. 

Now playing

There are two kinds of people in the world – those who get the Wankel, and those who don’t.

Plus there is a CX-5 turbo which is way faster than a base CX-5 or any CR-V, he needs to know his cars too.

I think whether or not the A-10 will remain useful depends entirely on who we see as “enemy combatants” in the next decade or so. They’re phenomenal against insurgents and the like (or small states without advanced military tech research, like Iran or North Korea), but if we intend to pick fights with Russia (and to a

Thing is, in 1999 audiences left theaters satisfied, almost giddy, with Episode 1.

“Thing is, in 1999 audiences left theaters satisfied, almost giddy, with Episode 1.”

Huh, maybe it was like that where you’re from.

Thing is, in 1999 audiences left theaters satisfied, almost giddy, with Episode 1.

I don’t remember ANYONE besides very young children liking Phantom Menace after seeing it, which the exception of the climactic lightsaber battle (even that was tainted by constant cuts to “let’s try spinning! woo hoo!” Anakin scenes).

I remember a handful of apologists trying really hard to rationalize how it wasn’t

Do NOT get me started on the idiocy that is the out of position and unbelted requirements for FMVSS. We design vehicles that are suboptimal for injury risk in certain conditions in order to better protect fools who do not wear their seatbelts. If they don’t want to wear their seatbelts, fine. What is insane is that

1) Im so conditioned to seatbelts that driving without one on feels like Im running through a crowded mall, entirely populated with bullies from my old school, totally naked.

Cadillac did not spend enough time re-building their perceived brand value. They put out a couple good models and immediately raised the prices once they got good reviews. Unfortunately, the public didn’t still didn’t see them as on par with BMW-MB-Audi. Then they did their styling change and the cars begun looking

To be fair, it probably should have stayed like that the whole time. 

It would be a total bonehead move to charge more than that for a base model. But this is GM, so they are liable for a total bonehead moves. It’s anyone’s guess at this point.

Nobody's asking that Jalopnik not cover F1. Common web forum etiquette is to avoid posting spoilers in subject lines. It's as easy as titling an article "Exciting race in Spain!", vs "Alonso dominates in front of his home crowd!". Then anybody who wishes to read about the race can do so, and anyone who has yet to be

This "spoiler in the headline" thing on Jalopnik seems to have started with you, Travis. And from the get go people have commented on it only to have you get all 8th grader snippy. What you have accomplished is to keep readers like me away from Jalopnik after races, sometimes for days, as I find the time to catch up

I'd be fine if you'd stop using the winner in the damn title. Ruined last week's race for me, and you've done it in the past. I can avoid an article with an F1 picture or title, I can't ignore the title itself.