Counterpoint, we need more black cars! They look amazing and this thing with having to wash it is absurd. I have 2 black cars and they look amazing.

Lambos in black look amazing. Also, I recommend checking out the Matte Black on Lambos - it’s even better..

Kappa

Counterpoint: don’t because it makes the car older than it is.

Scrolled down and wasn’t disappointed. There’s just something about a Yamaha that screams classy and cool at the same time.

I’m not a bike guy and never will be, but I’ve taken a look at bike prices out of curiosity. If you want nostalgia out of your bike you get a Yamaha which is cheaper and has the same cool factor (plus it’s a company that makes musical instruments). Otherwise, go with Ducati, BMW, Kawasaki or Triumph

Chevy did win everything in the past. Their C7.R is kinda obsolete which moves us to the sole purpose of their next mid engine Corvette C8. There are times when someone gets the formula right.

JDM spec is usually pretty low quality particularly because it’s made in India alongside the Maruti or at least the versions for the UK are. Europe spec and any other Suzukis with LHD are pretty good and very reliable. To be honest, any of the new Swift specs are better than the Up! GTI because they are less than…

I completely agree with you and I actually want to show you a car that everyone overlooks: the Suzuki Swift Sport with around 970 kg of weight and 140 horsepower. It’s the definition of a classic hot hatch: lightweight and zippy.

That actually looks like a cool project car. Stick the GT-R engine in it and you’ve got a fast sedan that is cheaper than an original.

Yeah, my bad, 4 liters (probably the 3.8 with some modifications to it). We’ll see how it goes. The 918 impressed everyone even though it was the most underpowered (though it had the best electric underpinnings and 4WD) so we may yet see a surprise. My problem, from a racecar point of view with TT hypercars is that…

I just find it very shocking. A 3.8 litre TT V8 is supposed to compete with two hybrid beasts? I mean, the Valkyrie will have a V12 with KERS and all manner of Formula 1 tech and the Project 1 has a hybrid Formula 1 engine for Christ’s sake... Those are halo cars for an entire generation (5-10 years) and the McLaren…

I just find it very shocking. A 3.8 litre TT V8 is supposed to compete with two hybrid beasts? I mean, the Valkyrie will have a V12 with KERS and all manner of Formula 1 tech and the Project 1 has a hybrid Formula 1 engine for Christ’s sake... Those are halo cars for an entire generation (5-10 years) and the McLaren…

What I don’t get is why bother with the design if you want it to be the fastest? Either make it pretty and sleek, or ugly and fast. Oh, and the name should have been reserved for the BP23, or whatever will compete with the Project 1 and the Valkyrie.

An exageration on my part, but the legal mechanism is the same.

I know what you’re saying, but as long as there are people who sign these contracts, these practices will continue on. It’s like when you get that billion dollar house as an inheritance under the condition that you never sell it.

You own it, but you sign a contract that can have a clause that forbids you to sell it for a certain period.

Yeah.. when they already had a finished design like the DB10, it was easy see that it would end up as the Vantage once they managed to fit the AMG V8 in and get the interior right.

Or you can get a Mazda MX-5 AND a CX-5 AND have money left to enjoy life..