I have confused the two models, but the car is still ugly in my opinion and (after some googling) the QX70 is a much better looking car than this and I don’t see why they wouldn’t go for that design language..

Does this mean that the team will no longer be called Lotus? If so, it would be a shame. The name brings a considerable fan following because it is legendary and therefore should be considered as a keeper by Renault..

Looks like a Subaru B9 Tribeca which is not a compliment..

The previous headlights looked awesome.. These look like they were taken from a 15 year old car.. Where are those sexy Infiniti FX35 from the first generation?

I agree.. It’s a damn fine company with good cars and the best diesels in the industry.. They screwed up and they will pay, but it’s not their doom by any means..

Researcher: Ooops.. Shouldn’t have uncovered that “cheat”.. Now let’s try to save VW with a “quick” fix before they chop my head off..

Toyota FT-1: Reinventing vaporware since the Honda NSX..

As a European watching the Republican candidates over the past few months:

Preach!

The Caddy is sweet but the other one should be called Puke-Royce..

Someone said that with this new Alfa they should redo the Quantum of Solace chase between the 159 and the DBS, only this time with this and a new Aston Martin DB11 that will be unveiled next year.. We also need to test the big titans in the segment. This Giulia will face the C-Klasse (let’s not remind ourseles about…

MY GOD... What is tahat abomination?

354 horses.. how much power do you think a regular DSG can take? I think a regular automatic is more appropriate if you want to keep prices lower..

As an answer for both 1) and 2) - I just like retro stuff..

Why do people here on Jalopnik think this car is ugly? It looks frickin’ futuristic in an attempt to look like an 80’s to 90’s concept. Oh and to whoever is calling this an A7 copycat, I’ll have to remind you that this sliced rear end is a design cue that’s even older than the Audi 100 that the A7 is trying to…

Really? I mean.. the Enterprise lasted for what? 50-60 years (albeit with some issues)..

I don’t know.. As a citizen of a NATO country I will always support military technology from my allies who can actually sustain such expenditures.. Of course, I am not crazy like some of your leaders to say that you guys need 600 ships or some other crazy number of logistics..

That was my point.. The guns are there for show while it fires the rockets at the enemy..

I know.. They are obsolete machines, but just one would boost up morale and, surrounded by some nice escorts, would be able to be used as a mobile missile platform.. Imagine that if instead of “them big-ass guns” you could have several missile launchers of different sizes.. The Russians have such a ship (the Kirov)..

Why can’t ‘Murica build one big-ass battleship with guns and lots of rockets and a nucular reactor? And also add a few nuclear destroyers/cruisers alongside these new supercarriers?