Rael042
Rael042
Rael042

So here's how you sell the sex education legislation to the reactionary Okie legislators ... only half joking because this might actually work: Okie Republican legislators! Hear me! We are graduating young men like Jesse & Zach who aren't even aware that it is illegal for them to have sex with girls under 16 once they

"The *anti-rape activists* who ..." where are the *pro-rape* activists this groups is opposing??? There are none. This Columbia university activist group is not protesting rape - it is protesting *due process for accused students*.

Easy to judge ... he may not have had that much more control in the face of this attraction than she did. Even so, he held out even after she started sleeping in his bed with him, until she actually initiated sex. We don't get the details of how she initiated exactly, so who knows? All I can say on this: if you accept

... and if the female rapist teacher gets pregnant, the mentally impaired underage rape victim will STILL be on the hook for child support once he turns 18. Sound fair to you?

... but by all means keep letting properly groomed sex tourists over 25 in? Seriously?!?

This factually challenged sentence early in the article reveals the bias of this article: "In August of 2012, on the first day of her sophomore year at Columbia, Emma Sulkowicz alleges that her friend, a fellow student named Paul Nungesser, held her down on his bed and violently raped her. " Erin, you COULD HAVE

Probably not ... most parents would probably just look at the sexual assault numbers & ignore the university's explanation that they are more scrupulous about reporting. It would be nice if there were a way to make all universities comply equally well.

I use "females" when I specifically want an age-neutral term that encompasses women, young women, & girls in one relatively neutral word ("girls" can sometimes sound condescending, no?). IMO it is the most concise way to do that.

Beastiality apologist!!!

This is the same Republican House that has been in power for almost 2 years now. The next congress, which also will have a Republican Senate, will not be seated until January. Elections don't take effect until the next calendar year. So they've had quite a while to plan this one.

And how exactly does a mattress carry a Columbia senior?

Cows, sheep, pigs & chickens are all capable of pain. Are the Republicans also going to ban animal slaughter ... (not likely)?

He also did NOT kill her. She killed herself. Lots of people get mocked in school. Only a few commit suicide over it.

So rape is OK if you feel bad about it after? Apologist!

Is he asking for "road head" ... (i.e. she gives him head while he is driving)? Or is the plan to pull over somewhere. Cause "road head" is dangerous fun ... not very safe.

A public feud between celebrities seems a very trivial thing for Anonymous to concern itself with. It surprises me that they would get involved at all.

The problems with the RS article are mostly about the information that came from Jackie, not about information that came from UVA. Even if UVA had specific information about Jackie's case it would not have been able to comment on it due to privacy laws. This seems like it's going off on a tangent. Looking for someone

"Sometimes I think good white people expect to be rewarded for their decency. We are not like those other white people. See how enlightened and aware we are? See how we are good?"

Not to mention that they can be housebroken within a month instead of requiring diapers for years, and that they might wake you up for 10 minutes in the middle of the night but they are NEVER going to keep you awake for hours on end.