Front Tires (unpowered): Put on mud flaps so they don't throw rocks at the body work. Rear Tires (powered, lots): Not my problem.

Can't go wrong with a Wright.

The boomerang design isn't for funzies, it was pretty damn well though out http://www.rutanboomerang.com/index.php/desi…

That's the Wasp Major, the Wasp was single row.

Been around for since the 90's amiright?

http://www.barnstormers.com/ is my personal favorite, its free to place an AD so there are a lot more (relatively) inexpensive aircraft.

Grumman Iron Works, hands down.

The VP-1 Volksplane

Model A powered Pietenpol Air Camper

Chevy LS6 Powered Seabee

Corvair powered airplane?

Yup. I is a A&P mekanik. ( I have to tone down the grammar because the Bureau of Labor defines me as unskilled labor)

Well that's the trick; Diesels have potential, but we don't have the fleet hours to truly know their reliability or longevity. First off, the auto-conversions are water cooled and bring along a host of issues because of that. Many humanitarian organizations around the world have moved to turbine aircraft because of…

Hammock going past the prop?

Worked for the sea dart!

Nope.

Pretty sure it's a lambo, bro

Its not "can run on jet fuel", they are only certified to run on jet fuel. Jet fuel is infinitely more available all over the world, because airliners fly all over the world. That, along with the EPA being quite upset about piston engine aircraft using leaded gas (100 Low Lead still has a LOT of tetraethyl lead in it)…

I counter your versatile plane with a more versatile plane; a seaplane with retractible wheels and skis. http://www.lisa-airplanes.com/en/akoya/ultra…

They are a Diesel cycle engine, they run on jet fuel. The big benefit is that they are way more efficient, and their low RPMs means you're going to run a gearbox and can fine tune that to an efficient prop speed.