The devs also mention some cool extra little details like a new karma system that’ll be in place in the countryside. Depending on how you comport yourself, the human inhabitants of the country will grow to trust you more or less, which will influence their decisions to help you in your fight against the zombies and…

DAE epic bacon? lolz >.<

what part of this is satire? parody, maybe, but calling it satire is giving it too much credit

i was in the same camp as you, i had a ps4 for a while and it was great but then i sold it and got an xbox one and man, it really is great. the exclusives don’t mean that much to me since i don’t play too too often and most shit i want to play is on both systems. being able to run my cable tv through it has made it…

“conceit” is more of a symbolic term; it’s generally the artistic device used to make the concept unique and usually requires some suspension of disbelief. the conceit of “jurassic park” is dinosaurs being brought back to life. the conceit of “back to the future” is an ordinary kid traveling through time. a concept is…

his face looks like a video game render here

no, i love non-sequitur humor as much as i love this site, but with the appalling shit going on at gawker and the way its dickhead writers are responding to it, i worry that the attitude will pour over into better blogs like this. it doesn’t help when that writer can’t even drudge up a better response to criticism…

comparing a blurb on kotaku to a piece in an art gallery like a dickhead

would it kill you to provide some fucking context? you’re paid to write, for christ’s sake

goddamn, who cares? this is a terrible article; it reads like he had an idea for a concept and it didn’t work out so he just transcribed a bunch of shit kids said. either way, why should i care if a fifth-grader cares about iwata’s death? fucking dumb. also:

which one is this? i remember the steve pop thing!

yeah, this is fuckin’ creepy. reminds me of robin williams’ toys

oh man i love this movie

more like “little to much” depending on what franchises you like

is everyone in this thread doing a bit? i promise i cannot see it. how do you explain the lower back right above the butt? how would he connect his skin unless he’s a weirdass merman creature?

it’s not clear when (or if) that might change anytime soon.

The spoilers in this review are minor, in my view, but they are there.

funny, it reads to me like the author told you to stay away if you care about spoilers. you read the review anyway. you brought it on yourself. stop acting like you’ve been fucked over by it. if the review were written without the paragraph i block quoted earlier i would be on your side, but here we are. i have zero…

minor or not, it warned the reader of spoilers and went so far as to actively discourage you from reading if you were concerned with who was showing up. you read it anyway, so that’s on you. stop bitching

If you are so into the Arkham games that you are going to be wounded by learning anything at all about Batman: Arkham Knight—what characters may or may not be in it, for example—please don’t read this review.