Shout this, sucka.

Obviously this will contain spoilers. You asked for it, but just a fair warning.

I still have yet to hear from one of you DRM apologists how Xbox One style DRM would be such a great or revolutionary thing for the industry. If you want to have an all-digital library, nothing is stopping you. All of these features have already existed on PC for years, anyway, but they aren't exactly revolutionary,…

He was asking about the original version.

My understanding is that it does, but requires manual alteration in some way (most likely of firmware or drivers). They also sell a PC version of the Kinect.

They legally are, in 49 states.

Oh, I am fully aware. I was just wondering if it has a scientific basis. I can imagine the torture it would bring to quantum physicists.

Would you really get a different measurement either way? I skipped that particular lab session in college.

"Now's not a good time, guys. Have a good one."

It works well for me too, but some people can't even get it to run. Thus, they can't even play their GFWL games. It has a lot of technical problems.

I think you meant to respond to someone else because I am most definitely a bonafide Infantryman.

It's because they are spending so much money on it that they don't want to tread too far from what has sold well in the past. Just like Hollywood.

That's just a reflection of the modern military's focus on COIN and the exaltation of the 'operator' as the pinnacle of military achievement. It takes the feeling that regular grunts have looking at Special Forces and Rangers with beards and thinking about training for selection and multiplies it by Mel Bay.

I agree. There is so much market space out there for shooters, more of it should be occupied by wacky stuff like this instead of the same tired old military fetishism. It's boring to play in the same modern battlefields with the same weapons as another generic Joe all of the time, which is one of the reasons Titanfall…

I have nothing wrong with the fact that you enjoy it and find it fun. That is great. You also are aware that it isn't something to be fanatically devoted to, so you enjoy it without waving it around like some kind of profound life choice. You have nothing to defend there and in my eyes you are beyond criticism.

I think that Dark Souls struck a really great balance in this. Your progress and state are always saved; even if you lose power your character will be right where you left it give or take 30 seconds or so. However, in order to progress through the level you have to reach and activate the next bonfire, and if you die…

Where along that almost infinite scale of sexuality and gender roles would you place My Little Pony fans? What percentage of the non-heteronormative population would you say they are and how great or the evils they suffer in relation to others along that spectrum?

The difference being that I'm not defending my being here and criticizing Bronyism as important for civil equity. I'm not the one trying to say that what I'm doing is beyond criticism because it is a huge psycho-sociological issue about acceptance and change. As you pointed out, that would be hypocritical of me just…

Ok, let me come at it from a different way.

Look around in these comments. Someone literally just drew the comparison between saying Bronies make one uncomfortable and saying the same about Jews in 1930s Germany.