Porxaderp
Porxaderp
Porxaderp

Just joking, guy. Relax. I guess the Deadspin comments section is meant to be serious business.

So you came here to simultaneously disparage addicts, and tell us you're better than them?
Well...I guess congratulations are in order. The internet agrees, you are better than someone, who you think is worthy of being dismissed offhandedly.

Mutually exclusive. What you are is lucky.

There's a difference between getting the right to say something and not getting criticized.

I believe there is a miscommunication here. I, like you, am a fellow Warrior of Truth and Ethics. If this Female is indeed a Man then this revelation would shake the very foundations of Gaming to its Mountain Dew powered core. THINK about the implications if this were true! If this Crime of the Millennium bears

Ummm no.

Oh good lord. Did you really just say that a person using the internet to be someone different than they are in real life is the same as harassing and sending death threats to people? Do you actually read the things you're typing? The argument is not centered around the fact that people do it all the time, but that it

The Nordic states (among others) beating our ass in a great many rankings of education, etc. tend to sway me away from thinking we're the best period. And I'd point out that where you'd most like to live is not always an indication of a country's objective quality.

"What's wrong with you then?"

Sony fan boys right now.

Jaaaasoooon!

Were are those pics and gifs as expressions of horror in all those rape cases on jezebel? Could you point me to them, please? He's not castrated, oh so no real harm done then, huh? Just unbearable pain, trauma (yes, men have a soul, we are actual human beings), reconstructive surgery and long time recovery. Sure, no

Put it in the but, kids. Put it in the butt.

No, you're wrong, it's totally Genetics fault!

It's not even the dissing of wikipedia that irritated me. It's the mention of "university" as though that makes you an authority, whilst not actually providing any evidence. "what i read in books" is only evidence if you tell people WHICH BOOKS. You want to make this conversation academic, follow academic practice.

It's not even the dissing of wikipedia that irritated me. It's the mention of "university" as though that makes you an authority, whilst not actually providing any evidence. "what i read in books" is only evidence if you tell people WHICH BOOKS. You want to make this conversation academic, follow academic practice.

It's not even the dissing of wikipedia that irritated me. It's the mention of "university" as though that makes you an authority, whilst not actually providing any evidence. "what i read in books" is only evidence if you tell people WHICH BOOKS. You want to make this conversation academic, follow academic practice.

Spend five years in prison.

This is not a gender war, it is a religious/cultural/philosophical war between conservatives and progressives.