Yeah, and people walk places too, so what is even the point of cars existing?
Porxaderp
Porxaderp
Blisteringly hot take, bro.
My favorite part about this argument is that the idiots who use it actually think they’re making a clever point.
“If you ban selling armored cars, people will just make one themselves form Home Depot. If you ban any gun that a firearm illiterate person thinks looks military grade (i.e. any gun painted black with something to cool the barrel) then people will just obtain them from an illegal source.”
His body was not ready.
Mike ‘Possibly the Worst Player in the US’ Ross is proof of that. But we love him for it.
Lol the entire point of that guy was “You are not meant to beat me, this is the kind of bullshit you should expect from an end-game Gwent player, go get better cards.”
A) So he’s not allowed to be the arbiter of tackiness, but you’re allowed to be the arbiter of art? Hey, at least you’re a CONSISTENT hypocrite.
I’m a firm believer in ownership of my body and my choices.
“Or maybe have committees set up to decide whether my personal taste meets their requirements.”
Whose tattoo wasn’t done by the artist in question. Once again, you’re really bad at this.
You’re really bad at this “argument” stuff, you should look up “logical fallacies”. Or keep looking like a fucking idiot. Your choice.
What of the tattoo artist’s agency? Fuck him, right?
Uh, no, he didn’t.
And this is why the author is a double-asshole.
“We worry way too much about other people and their business in this country. How hard is it to live and let others live?”
And yet none of the tattoos she linked to were hand or neck tattoos, which is what he explicitly refused to do.
Hohoho give it time. Give it time...
Why is it that you people making this asinine comment always forget that actual EVIDENCE is the entire point?