Yeah, comparing poor/crippled people to animals is TOTALLY helping your case for eugenics.

"ITS NOT LIKE I HAD A GUN TO YOUR HEAD"

So you'd be cool if the prosecution/judge offered a plea deal that included having sex with the prosecutor and judge? I mean, they don't HAVE to accept it.

"speeding"

I have a question - IF instead of ducks it were a primed nuclear bomb that only she knew how to defuse... what then?

"Because no one is going to think "Oh no, I shouldn't pull over right now because I could be convicted of criminal negligence causing death"."

Technically? Yes.

Can you kindly point out which part allows her to stop for ducks?

And I guess we can't charge someone who celebrates their sports team victory by shooting into the air because WHAT IF HE WAS DEFENDING HIS FAMILY FROM PTERODACTYLS?!

There's a not-so-subtle difference between being absolutely perfect in every way and stopping in the middle of the highway to help some fucking ducks, but I wouldn't expect an idiot like you to notice it.

I'd say taking the side of someone who stopped in the middle of the highway TO HELP DUCKS is pretty much the definition of "promoting chaotic behavior".

Yeah, they have a word for your kind of data: Anecdotal. You have your word, they have sources.

They backed up their assertions with links. You back up your assertions with "NUH UH".

So you're butthurt that people liked GTAV more than Watch Dogs. Got it.

Realistic ≠ better.

How can you claim to be impartial when you're comparing the graphics of a last-gen console game to a next-gen console game?

"Physics and driving physics are a step back for both Watch Dogs and GTA V compared to GTA IV."

So you don't know what the word "all" means, Merriam?

Maybe you should become obsessed with educating yourself instead, that way you won't make the stupid assumption that ALL SCIENCE IS THE SAME.

If the makers/researchers of Viagra are at fault for the lack of cancer meds, commenting on Jezebel makes you at fault for all of the worlds starving children.