Well it's in MY history book.

Awww, how adorable, you dismissed all the comments that expose what an idiot you are.

This dude straight dismissed 90% of the conversation that exposed why he's a know-nothing dipshit. Bobsplosion is afraid of using his brain.

What do you call the torrents of uneducated shit flowing out of your mouth then?

Go back to spamming gifs, it's what you do best.

So I guess I was just imagining that massively-Like'd comment on another article that basically said "all men want to rape you, some of them can just control the rape urge better"?

I am so, so sorry that your echo chamber was disrupted.

It's funny how you mention he got EXTREMELY LUCKY to be in the position he is in, but then go on with the old bootstraps routine. I guess he just boot-strapped himself into that luck, eh?

The thing I like about conservatives and libertarians using the "lifts all boats" saying is that the rising tide only lifts all boats because gravity distributes all the water equally, which is THE DREADED SOCIALISM. If that isn't irony, I don't know what is.

So yeah, in Magical Sunshine Land, libertarianism is possible. Good to know.

How is drunk driving not an intentional crime? Did they slip and fall into the driver seat of a running car?

Oh yippee, argumentum ad populum.

You sound like one of Rob Ford's constituents.

Please note that Gemmabeta's post doesn't exist in a vacuum. It was made in response to Poet Desmond, who argued IN FAVOR of the death penalty because he felt that it is cheaper to execute someone than to jail them for life.

"in cases where there is no doubt"

Yeah, drunk driving murders are just mistakes, it's not like they KNEW that drunk driving dramatically increases your chance of murdering someone. Oh wait, they absolutely DO know that, but think that they're better than the average person and so that doesn't apply to them.

Very true, although the words "humans are completely trustworthy in all situations" strung together in that order should be obvious enough.

You can have complete trust in my assessment that Pitchblende's comment was sarcasm.

"I should add that it's hard to imagine someone arguing that capitalism is NOT an inequality-producing machine."

Yeah, he just happened to use a picture that has context almost identical to his own. Total coincidence.