What's hilarious is that apparently the No-Planes theory is TOO CRAZY for most 9/11 Truthers, and most 9/11 Truther forums will ban any discussion on the topic.
Porxaderp
Porxaderp
You carry out your conversations with friends in public with bullhorns? Because that's the real life equivalent of a Tweet.
Is it impossible for you to change your hair length in the same way that it is impossible for homosexuals to change their preferred fuckpartner?
"Unrealistic? I did. It is hard, but not super duper hard."
"When did I say I was replying to the article?"
"If you don't currently smoke don't start, e or otherwise."
"I never said I was!"
What an original reply.
You didn't respond to the article dipshit, you responded to Eric the RC guy.
Not even to mention the fact that they SPECIFICALLY said they were safer than cigarettes, and you even repeat it in your own comment. Then YOU go on and set up the strawman about them being 100% safe, when he never made that claim.
Says the person who apparently didn't even read the comment he replied to.
Also, the analogy breaks down when you factor in the whole addiction angle. Of course it's ideal to neither smoke nor vaporize (I do neither), but its unrealistic to expect people to just quit cold turkey.
"If you don't currently smoke don't start, e or otherwise."
If the alternative is shooting yourself? Yes.
I don't smoke e-cigs or even regular cigarettes, nor do I vaporize. Try again.
Do you really want to risk a rocket packed full of nuclear waste catastrophically failing at high altitude?
What is there to counter?
"I don't know why I bother to argue with people who choose to associate with a product for whom Jenny McCarthy and this guy are the poster children."
"burning it"