Those are games that are trying to look like a cartoon, or the source that they're based on.This is a game trying to look like a movie, or at least use techniques that make the game feel like a movie. If they feel that pushing higher frame rates would go against that purpose, why would they care so much about it?

Yes. That's what the "too" implies.

And video games are not cartoons, but that doesn't stop people from making games to look like them.

I read it, and it's a big "if they can't produce motion blur" tangent that was probably relevant early last gen. Motion blur to make up for lost frames, and using cinematic camera work (framing, FOV, filters, etc), and good animation will bring you into what feels closer to a movie than a game. 60fps disconnects you…

This is also new, if you want some gameplay:

The footage clearly shows a cover-based third person shooter. It's everywhere.

Movies have been a certain way for a long time. Audiences find it to be the standard. They hesitate to move to things like HFR because it's different than what they've experienced at the movies for decades. Some people like what it did on a technical level, but most people find it a way to charge for more (like 3D).

if it were 60fps, it would be too smooth, and it wouldn't feel like a movie. Not sure how this is escaping most people.

They're doing it to make it feel more like a movie.

Most gaming channels that have seen the gameplay mention that there is actual gameplay in the trailer, and the quality is seamless between cutscenes, QTEs and regular gameplay, using the exact same assets and rendering.

AAA Movies (usually action, sci-fi, etc) that are "1080p" on Blu-Ray are usually 2:40 / 1920 x 800

I'm expecting you to say something like "I just fucked your mom last night". It's okay, man. Being butthurt is difficult to deal with, but you'll get over it soon.

Vita is at around 8 million units. That's not PSP level, but that's still decent, and only slightly less than the original Xbox or Gamecube in the same amount of time. WiiU has more games and a predecessor that sold over 100 million, but Nintendo just couldn't convert them.

And, that's why even the Vita has better sales than it does.

PSN wasn't great, but was free (and is now much improved). You didn't need to pay to use Netflix. PS+ was always an Opt-in subscription to get these deals, not something mandatory just to use half the system. Fun fact: There are more PS Vitas out there than there are WiiU's (and they're only a few months apart), and…

Okay, I guess maybe you got the point I would have made, but here it is again.

....why would you want to stop subscribing to PS+ when you get new games every month across 3 platforms?

Sonic meets Ratchet & Clank.

Correct.

You may not be the only one, but you definitely seem to be in the minority. I don't think the XBO is ugly, just gargantuan. Especially when you consider that the power brick is thicker than the PS4.