Don't think they're using it as a cop-out in this instance. You need to beta test a streaming service.
Don't think they're using it as a cop-out in this instance. You need to beta test a streaming service.
It's easy based on the assumption that he's at liberty to discuss those topics. I sensed the evasiveness but maybe you would have been better served with answers by interviewing the person who made the announcements than a director who's only focused on his present job.
And jobless, like this guy...
I'm glad he resisted the urge to just say, "Deal with it!"
Didn't know promises needed to be kept in BETAS.
The thing is you can't hack the system to force them to work with EA. ;)
I doubt it's because of infrastructure despite your back-end experience. Sony already does this with PS Plus subscriptions and they have many more games than EA has in their Plus library. I think it's more because of the direction competition it poses against PS Plus & PS Now.
I guess you weren't around during the early days of last gen.
I'm sure the other pubs will follow suit i.e. Activision, 2K, etc. with their own little subscription plans.
Ah, I see but the way I see it PSNow as something totally different from what EA is doing. PSNow is a streaming service while EA, from what I understand, will allow you to download the game, making it more similar to PS+ (I'm still unclear about the recentness of the EA titles and size their library will be).
Listening? I think they were first with PS Plus.
This would be great if it included all newer sports games. I wouldn't have to keep buying the same Madden game every year! Otherwise, meh.
PC Name: pc3
CPU: Intel Core i5-3570K Quad-Core Processor 3.4 GHz 4 Core LGA 1155 OC
Cooling: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO
Graphics Card: ASUS GTX 660 Ti Series Graphics Card Overclocked Edition
Motherboard: ASUS P8Z77-V LX LGA 1155 Intel Z77 HDMI SATA 6Gb/s
Memory: Corsair Vengeance Blue 8 GB
Storage: Kingston Digital…
I would add, in no particular order:
False. Have a good day.
You should boycott consoles too, since it's these console manufacturers that pay for timed exclusivity of content that hurts gamers, as well. I hope you have strong principles.
You don't know that. Like I said, Sony has a great relationship with Insomniac. Their studios collaborate with one another and Insomniac still makes exclusive games for Sony. The rest is speculation on whether or not Sony wasn't playing ball.
It's happened before and will continue to happen again and again. Don't you remember Rockstar's GTA IV content, Episodes from Liberty City? Yeah, one year timed exclusivity between 360 and PS3.
Real Bungie fans would have had a Mac, PC, Xbox and PS to play their games. This however is a case of one fanbase on one console throwing tantrums.
False. Insomniac had always been independent, it wasn't till recently that EA became their de facto publisher, which usually publishes on multiple platforms. Insomniac wanted to retain the rights to their game so it was EA that didn't "play ball" by not agreeing to ownership demands, therefore Insomniac allowed MS to…