So.... proof at last that there is no difference between men and women?
So.... proof at last that there is no difference between men and women?
AoT doesn’t mock fascism, it shows it for the horror it is. It shows how every single person is victimized by fascism. AoT has no heroes, that’s the whole point. They are all both victims and perpetrators in an endless cycle of violence.
If you think AoT theme is about supporting fascism rather then a scathing indictment on it, you really need to work on your reading comprehension.
Free to play game has predatory gacha practices. More at five! Seriously though... the whole tone of this article is one of mystified surprise. Are you alright Nathan? How long have you know about the existence of F2P games that you are just now discovering how insidious this shit is?
The real market for this shit, where it makes the most money, is China. So no, you're not gonna get any actual gay stuff because they don't want it. Want that to change? Spend more money then China.
The inbred oppressor? Basically the very picture of what women and poc have been protesting vigorously for the past 4+ years is now their object of affection? I really can’t with you people.
If you were a reporter, you’d have done the research and the math. But that’s typical kotaku gawker nonsense. You’re a reporter or a blogger depending on what suits you.
Namedropping Force Awakens is a good way to kill any buzz before it starts. Besides that... Does anybody really want this? I can't imagine nostalgia will generate that many sales considering how niche this was. And why would younger gens care about yet another nostalgia cashgrab?
The mandate is to get clicks. And identity politics presented in an angry way are the easiest route to clicks from reactionary nerds. Just ignore the gawker nonsense and it's a decent article.
Blaming Snyder for toxic fans without even discussing i09's role or other blogs in fanning the toxic flames for clicks and profit is disengenuous at best.
It is a thing, but that doesn’t mean you’re not responsible for your own actions.
He's not honestly concerned about anything artistic. His contract gives him a cut of revenue. But there's no direct revenue from launching on a streaming service. He's pissed that Warner Bros is screwing him out of a paycheck.
Yup, this is American capitalism as intended. A free unregulated market will always generate a monopoly. If you want competition, you need regulation.
I mean... this is standard now right? Movie comes out, io9 gives a positive review. Then it magically turns out that everyone who actually saw the movie realized it was shit and io9 runs a bazillion articles about how they knew the movie was shit all along and the director is probably racist/sexist/whatever.
You can get lootboxes in most F2P games for free. Doesn’t mean they’re not lootboxes.
With events in London and Netherlands right now, same Haru. Same.
Sounds like eugenics to me. Who decides whose sperm gets up there? If anything, restoring the human race from that will lead to less biodiversity. If you want mankind to survive an apocalyptic event you don’t need semen, you need colonies on other planets. Also... if we suffer a catastrophic event, how the fuck are we…
That’s Gawker for you. Praise everything before it’s out, gauge actual responses from people, then generate outrage. And then, generate outrage over the outrage.
And in the end... it wasn’t Agatha all along. Frankly, was it Agatha at all? What evil thing did she really do in the end?
Jason Isaacs or John Noble. When Disney announced they were doing the sequel trilogy I really wanted them to go up against John Noble as an old cunning Thrawn.