Peterpieper
Peterpieper
Peterpieper

Any airport in India? That's a stretch. Any smaller airport, however, is pretty cray. But honestly, small airports in the U.S. suck too.

You must not have flown in or out of New Delhi recently. They completely renovated the airport a few years ago and it is very, very nice. Also, last time I flew, I got there only 30 minutes before an international flight, and I made it with time to spare.

Exactly, you have to have money to be part of the club. But let's not kid ourselves, women experience this differently, because we are expected to wear form-flattering/fitting skirts, heeled footwear, and makeup.

You're assuming I'm short. I'm in fact very tall and bitter that I have to buy expensive suits to cover my knees/fall at the right point at my feet.

In other words, their advice is: 1. Have money. 2. Don't not have money. 3. Be attractive. 4. Don't be unattractive.

I'm also part of the legal professions and I get that, especially in court, you do have to dress a certain way as a woman. I would never put my own sartorial choices ahead of what's best for my client. But at some point, you are reinforcing sexist attitudes if you continue to say this path is the only path for women

They really aren't so different, despite the author's pretension. ;P

I disagree with that take though! SPOILER WARNING:

It's still ethnic cleansing. Jews were not considered "citizens" of Germany (they were legally stripped of their citizenship by the Nazi's), Native Americans not "citizens" of US, etc.

I think she's just a lying, lier, lier-face. How do you give birth to several children and still worry about poop? don't most women have BM's during childbirth, even?

I know for a fact that J. Crew has used sweatshop labor. I did not research Tory Burch's practices to see whether or not they also use sweatshop labor. But not all clothing brands do, so that's why I said "perhaps."

I don't buy from either. But, as a principal, I think fashion houses do produce "art" of sorts, and price accordingly. I have no idea what Tory Burch's sourcing practices are but I know that J. Crew has sourced from sweatshops with horrific conditions. Presumably some fashion houses care more about where they

Your point was that "rich" people are too "rich" to shop at J. Crew, while at the same time making a jab at Tory Burch. But some rich people must be shopping there, because it is too expensive for middle class and poor people to shop there.

I think it's incredibly overpriced and only people with large disposable incomes shop there, among other places.

J. Crew is massively overpriced for what you're getting (cheap, generic, business casual clothing). At least with more high-end designers (Tory Burch) you're getting something stylish/perhaps not made with sweatshop labor.

The study you were referring to was a single study referenced in the BBC program. It was my understanding that porn viewing was considered a "risk factor" for violent attitudes, as are a number of other things that we associate with antisocial behavior (childhood abuse and neglect, mental illness, intellectual

Y'all need to edit your title, which is a straight-up lie. Even ignoring the problems with the study (small sample size, recorder bias), the study you're citing only concluded that there was correlation between watching porn and negative gender attitudes. It did not state that there was a causation between watching