Peterpieper
Peterpieper
Peterpieper

Seems like she's shilling for Birkin here, albeit awkwardly. I really doubt she's paid cash for them.

Actually, he has a reputation for being a bit of a player, or at least he used to, when he was still in Parliament.

The ~70/30 statistics I saw were from the Bureau of Justice Statistics. They reflect the full picture, not just victims who report to police.

That's absolutely true. But I believe that acquaintance rapes are less likely to be reported to the police in the first place. So when we're talking about how police treat rape victims generally, we have to consider that a good proportion of victims they interface with are victims of stranger rape.

The author of the original article promoted my post on wrongful convictions/mis-identifications (see the third or fourth comment down). I'm contributing to the thoughtful discussion here, not "hijacking." Don't call me a feminist troll, whatever the fuck that means.

That makes sense. Thanks.

That's nice that you don't think wrongful convictions are a women's issue, that they don't affect women directly or indirectly.

I don't have any reason to think that the 2-8% number isn't reliable. I'm not taking issue with false reporting statistics. I'm saying that mis-identifications are a major problem in criminal cases, regardless of the crime.

Thanks for that. But there are no accurate statistics for false identifications. The only reason we have a window into how false identifications lead to wrongful convictions is because people have studied the 150+ cases of wrongful convictions, where people have been exonerated due to new DNA evidence. Brain

That's hyperbole. Thousands of people get convicted of rape every year. Police testimony is often critical to getting those convictions.

I still feel like people in this conversation should not be lumping together these dissimilar cases (stranger vs. acquaintance/relative/intimate partner). Victims from the latter categorically are much less likely to contact the police. So when we're talking about how the police handle these cases, I think we have

The Innocence Project also studies the 150+ cases of people who have been exonerated to better understand how they were convicted in the first place. False witness identifications are a major cause of wrongful convictions. Many cases have no DNA evidence and there are people sitting in prison who cannot be

Can you give me a source for that 80% number? Also (and this is not diminish victims), if rapes are not being reported/police are failing to pursue reported rapes, how can that number possibly be accurate?

Where are you getting your statistics from? If police are failing to report rapes, how do we know that non-stranger rapes are the overwhelming majority of rapes?

That's a very different scenario, for sure. I think this is a class issue as well. Police will take people more seriously if the are from a certain socioeconomic background. Police tend to be much less respectful to poor people and people of color.

Not exactly. There's falsely reporting rape. There's also falsely identifying the perpetrator (if it's a stranger). The Innocence Project has documented how unreliable eyewitness testimony is and how it has lead to people being put on death row for crimes they didn't commit. It's not that victims lie. It's how

Eyewitness testimony, including those of rape victims, has led to wrongful convictions. Eyewitness testimony, of any crime victim, is often not reliable. This article fails to draw the distinction between how we remember traumatic assaults and how we remember features of a stranger who may have perpetuated the

You go girl! Kill those brown boys! Three cheers for war everybody!

vBravo. Really.