@JulieSunday: Definitely. But many countries seem to forget about that when drafting their foreign policies (my own included) and need frequent reminding.

@PopsicleToes: I can't tell you how this incenses me.

It's called "kink" and it's not a disorder, or proof of one. Seriously, it's pretty darn insulting to regard it as such.

I don't think it's entirely hopeless. From what I saw below, here [ca.jezebel.com] it may very well influence true small-government advocates. And there have been several anti-choice senators who have spoken out against it as well [jezebel.com]

@SkaHimself: Wow. Pro-choice organizations should REALLY pay attention to this.

@margarine for error: "This bill, this amendment, will increase the number of abortions." Thus spoke Lynch, who went on to call himself prolife.

Please, please please Senators, keep hammering away at the fact that one dollar spent on Title X is four dollars gained. Because I'm really not sure whether anyone intending to vote for the budget cuts would be swayed by the argument that it's simply wrong to wage war on women and low-income families. The people who…

I had to look him up, indeed, as it only vaguely rang a bell. His Wikipedia article is squeaky clean, but six pages in Vanity Fair told a different story.

@deeemer: I think it can be both; both an attitude of not having to apply oneself and no effective encouragement. The latter can be gender-related but that would be highly dependent on environment (parents, teachers, etc)

Toledano and Arnault are no doubt banking on being able to salvage the good name of the brand, but who will want to shoot and buy clothing made by a man who's now more famous for talking about which people should be gassed than for his command of the bias cut?

I found out when half a discussion I'd read didn't show up when I wanted to read on on my phone half an hour later. But as you can't see which comments are greyed and which black (if you can see the grey ones at aall?), it's hard to compare exactly.

About the mobile site: I'd like the option to see the classic site instead of the mobile.

Agreed on the indent. I need more separation, this is just confusing now.

Oh shit oh shit oh shit. I hadn't seen any of that.

Provided you'd want to, of course.

@HelenLovejoy: Yes. And I love the cut, especially the upper half. I covet it so much. The only improvement I could think of was the split in front, but it's a minor one, in reality.

@unmoldednicole: Everything seems to. That woman is uncanny in more ways that one.

@j. cruel: Absolutely. And I think no one would've called it "mumsy" if the wearer had been 24.

Thought so too! Leo's dress looks much better 'in movement'. After seeing the pic, I was astonished at the loveliness of it in the broadcast.

I know that.