Yeaaah. I don’t not.

Lol. You’re a damn fool.

1) Exactly none of that is what I said. You alleged that she committed another act, and your “proof” was that she did this. I said you can’t use this act to prove the first act. And now you’re rambling about something unrelated. If you’re not even going to bother to keep the thread of the conversation in mind, maybe…

Why are many male jez commenters so obsessed with pushing “innocent until proven guilty” until they think a woman has done something they don’t like? We can’t know Bill Cosby raped those women, but this woman totally perjured herself.

Because a header image is usually one picture and there aren’t a lot of pictures of them and their kids together? Because we all know who Kelly Rutherford is, and her face is recognizable?

Thank you. The comments on these stories are so frustrating because a bunch of people take his side of the story along with a bunch of unproven allegations about Rutherford and claim them as fact, and then say, “I’m not biased! I have no dog in this fight! I just know that she is wrong and evil because she must have…

You offer nothing more than a photograph as contrary evidence to allegations of verbal abuse. You put the photo directly after you quote that line. Whether or not you intended to say that his appearance negated the allegations, that’s what your comment served to do. If you’d wanted to communicate that we should have a…

Rutherford has no business having full custody because of that phone call, they say. It’s her fault all of this happened in the first place!

Abusive people don’t look like cartoon villains, but rather like normal people. I’m not saying this guy is abusive, but posting a smiling photo of him with his kid literally proves nothing one way or the other.

Girls “above” him in the social hierarchy, clearly. He cared nothing for them except as Monopoly markers of his “power.”

I’m gonna sing the doom song now!

INVADER ZIM IS HONESTLY ONE OF THE GREATEST NICKELODEON CARTOONS SO THANK YOU <33

This!

Normal people go to the internet for their nudes. This guy obviously wants to dominate the girls. He doesn’t care about the pictures. He just wants to show he can make people do what he wants. And if they don’t, they get slaughtered.

I mean, you can raise your child to know that women are people but in today’s society every other person outside of your home will remind him that in fact we are not. With their actions, with their laws, with their assumptions, with their words.

I guess it was more about having power and sway over his female colleagues than it was about noodz

Oh wow, another misogynist woman-hating teenager who wants to murder women en masse because he was rejected by a female. This shit is getting real old. People - stop raising your boys to think that they are *owed* a woman. We are people, we have agency, we are NOT prizes that one can “win” by being nice or because you…

A point that a fair number of readers seem not to be getting is this: The problem isn’t that journalists made jokes about a grim story. The problem is that they based their jokes on pretty much all the facts and backstory of the story except for the single most salient and chronically overlooked one, and in so doing…

I think that one of the main reasons these jokes are considered acceptable is the way it was framed by the media - as a Barnes vs. Fisher battle . Two rich men acting like High Schoolers over a girl is funny. However, that framing eliminates Gloria from the story. By doing so, it eliminates the real terror that must…