*massive shudder*

Not for anyone.

Consuming the material IS producing it in this case. Consuming child pornography IS an act of abuse. And for someone who claims not to be pro-child abuse, you’ve invested a repellant amount of time in “objectively” defending those who consume it. It’s not hard to make the connection, pal, at least not for anyone other…

80s isn’t vintage!

Oh, you poor lamb, still hung up on the fuck who got away. :( :( :(

Dear, APOV, I invite you, with utmost civility, to go fuck yourself. Enjoy! You deserve it!

Oh, did you want to have a civil discourse? When were you planning on starting the civil part? Since, you know, derailing conversations and attempting to center them on your right to get your dick wet is pretty much the opposite of civility. So you let me know when you can manage to be a civil human being when it…

Lol no.

I’m sorry, could you please be less incomprehensible when you’re attempting clever put-downs?

No, actually, the fact that you refuse to acknowledge the latter half of that - which is that people should be mean when domineering asshole dudes get kicks out of forcing their attentions on random women, while pretending that they don’t realize they’re being domineering assholes getting their kicks out of forcing…

Who gives a shit if you’ve been civil in your misogynistic bullshit? Catch the fucking snap, you dinosaur.

I can’t decide if that’s giving him too much credit or if he’s really that much of an idiot.

Hey, if you’re so determined to embrace your child-abuse enabling viewpoints, far be it from me to dissuade you.

I’m...not sure we were looking at the same vintage Playboys.

Nope. People should be mean, especially to you. Fuck off, champ!

Soooo are you Harry McKenzie with a sock puppet screen name, or are there two assholes in this post sea-lioning about wanting to know why there’s no turkey on their ham sandwiches?

Lol you moron. Hint: this article is about you.

I didn’t miss your point, you’re simply clueless about this issue and are too busy bleating your own tedious thoughts and suggestions to listen to what people are telling you. You can take your tone-policing and cram it with walnuts, though! Enjoy!

God, it’s like passive abject racism wasn’t enough, they needed to make it as active and deliberate as possible. Wonderful.

Oh man, some of the “classic” Playboy pictures? They’re practically WHOLESOME. The women are cute, they’re smiling, they’re doing normal-person stuff, they look like they may even be enjoying themselves, and they’re all fairly different, physically (within certain parameters, to be sure, but way wider parameters than…