And choice has nothing to do with whether it’s exploitative. Why is this such a difficulty for you to comprehend?

That depends. Does your employer refuse to pay you a living wage while profiting off your labors? Then yes, you have been exploited! Exploitation has nothing to do with the willingness of people to put up with being exploited. Do you define crime by the reaction of the victim too? If a rich person is robbed of a…

It’s IN THE ARTICLE, you moron.

Because it’s homophobic, you creep. Because cheating is not the same as having to hide WHO YOU ARE because you may be abused, assaulted, ridiculed, fired or MURDERED. Go fuck yourself if you think this is an acceptable thing to say, god. What is it with people who identify as non-monogamous that makes them such…

Yup, it really really is. Fuck off some more!

No thanks, fuck off!

Actually, it is. If it’s not what you MEAN to be saying, then perhaps you should revisit what you ARE saying and revise.

God, you’re really a fucking jerk. You manufacture a whole internal monologue for this woman rather than having even a shred of empathy or knowledge of human behavior. Hint: not everyone’s as petty and passive aggressive as you seem to be.

That’s nice, don’t care.

Well since I haven’t berated anyone, this comment is as obnoxious as all your other ones. And holding cheating to be wrong and shitty regardless of motivation does not equal berating. So you’re 0-for-2. Good one!

You’re really obnoxious about this. I think it’s time to stop being a jackass.

What do I fucking care what order you made them in? You said this:

Wow. You’re way more of a nasty asshole than I thought. Are you sure you mean to be on Jezebel? Maybe you got lost on your way to some dank festering hole of internet assholes that’s waiting for you right now, worried sick that you’re not back yet? Monogamy isn’t detrimental to society any more than polyamory is…

That may be what your point is now, but that’s not what your original comment said. And I think you’d be disappointed in how very few people seeking extramarital affairs via Ashley Madison did so out of a frustrated desire to explore genuine, two-party non-monogamy, rather than a desire to cheat on their spouse while…

I’ve got a better idea, how about you go fuck yourself? Puritanical is an adjective, it means overall strictness and rigidity in morality, as RELATED to Puritans and extrapolated to contemporary society. Claiming that people taking issue with cheating is puritanical - which is what you’re doing, so drop the act - is…

Your logic continues to be dumb. Representation in a zip code is the least meaningful possible estimate of whether people are or can be happy in monogamous relationships. And you can also look at it as: AM accounts being found in all but three zip codes means we need to start being honest about personal responsibility…

What a shitty thing to say, that people who think cheaters - not people who are openly non-monogamous, not people who are polyamorous, not people in open marriages, but CHEATERS - have done something harmful and selfish to their partners MUST have been cheated on themselves. Maybe people aren’t defensive but are…

Monogamy isn’t puritanical. What an asinine thing to say.

Fuck off. The OP blamed cheating on society without any actual critical thought about a) how much cheating is motivated by a person being unsuited for monogamy rather than a person being selfish and specifically into the act of cheating on a partner, b) how one can discuss non-monogamy without insisting on a blanket…

No. Fuck the fuck off with this shit, stop comparing people who secretly sought heterosexual partners outside their heterosexual marriage to closeted/self-denying homosexuals. It’s shitty and homophobic and you need to fucking stop.