Unfortunate, but probably true.
Unfortunate, but probably true.
So… maybe it’s the fact that humans sometimes have problems comprehending large numbers or something, but I’m having trouble wrapping my head around the weight of the ecoROTR dome. 20,000 pounds? 10 tons? I clicked on the link to the source article, and it listed the same number, so it’s not a typo. But wouldn’t the…
Well, if a 10% wage increase increased prices .4% doesn’t sound all that bad… until you realize that’s .4% per part, and the average car has around 30,000 parts in it today. Fast forward 50 years, and that’s part of the reason that the Cadillac Don Draper paid $6,500 for in 1960 would cost him $72,000 today.
Flawed premise is flawed.
“However, a pilot’s choices are greatly diminished if neither engine is making power simultaneously.”
I was half expecting this list to be:
Something something metaphor for the eventual failure of any model of Keynesian economics...
You aren't the only one.
I don't imagine that there are many members of that club. And I imagine the members wish they weren't.
Not 1995 MSRP; they are talking about the MSRP of a new one today. A little misleading? Maybe. But it is all there in the article.
Yeah, pretty much what I expected. You’re blind to the truth. TARP was a separate program from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Again, pesky “facts” getting in the way, blinded by your partisan loyalty.
I don’t know that I’d include your #18 there. Clinton never had a surplus, let alone a balanced budget. They got close, but the way they did it is part of what put us in the situation we’re in today. Raiding social security, etc.
Um, I’m going to say this, knowing full well “logic”, “reason”, and “fact” are probably no match for your blind partisan tunnel vision. Starting with the 110th Congress, the Democratic Party held the majority in Congress (and even before that, Obama, Clinton, Kerry, Reid, Pelosi, et al. voted for the war in Iraq. But…
Funny how people want to discount, in this case, Churchill, because he lived and made his comments in a different era, yet the (failed) economic ideologies of John Maynard Keynes are still as relatable today as they were then, because… reasons?
Yup. because who cares about things like ‘Gravity’, or even usability, when you can make a statement like putting a quote on the roof?
Do you seriously think that only the GOP engages in voter manipulation?
I went from one extreme to the other. From Chicago to Phoenix. What it taught me was that neither party is 100% right; likewise, no party is 100% wrong. Straight party line is for suckers, and how you end up with ex-governor/current inmate Rod Blagojevich (in Illinois) on one end, and Doug Ducey in Arizona.
I’m not sure I understand your post, whether you’re being sarcastic or not. Do you think that the only ‘nutbags’ are in the GOP?
It’s cute that you think that only the GOP would attempt to steal an election. And it’s too bad, because I agreed with your post, right up until that last line.
Oh wow, that’s terrible. I’d not seen that before, and now I can’t unsee it.